September 8, 2016 — SEAFOOD NEWS — Oceana has released a new ‘study’ claiming that 20% of global seafood trade is mislabeled.
The study was not a scientific sampling, but instead an analysis of Oceana’s sampling of high-risk species in various countries such as escolar, pangasius, and hake. They also had a high proportion of snapper and grouper samples, species where literally dozens of genetically distinct species are legally sold under one name.
However, the implication to consumers is that they should suspect that their McDonald’s pollock fillet could potentially be mislabeled. It is not.
The seafood industry and the supply chain have focused increasingly on traceability in the past few years.
NFI says “mislabeling is fraud and fraud is illegal, period. We emphasize that NFI members are required to be members of the Better Seafood Board, the only seafood industry-led economic integrity effort. And NFI Member Companies are at the forefront of eliminating fish fraud.”
NFI suggests that Oceana would be far more effective lobbying for stronger enforcement of existing laws.
The report was released prior to an upcoming Our Oceans conference in Washington, and also to pressure the Presidential Task Force on Combating IUU Fishing and Seafood Fraud to issue stronger recommendations.
The task force has proposed to require traceability for 13 species deemed to be at risk of IUU fishing and fraudulent labeling. However, the requirements would only be for imports, and not apply to commerce within the US.
Oceana wants species scientific name traceability to extend to all seafood, period. They hold up the EU traceability requirements for imports as a model, and say that this has helped reduce seafood fraud in Europe. Yet at the same time they document numerous examples of mislabeling in the UK, Italy, Belgium and Germany and other EU countries (see map).
The fact is that importers still have little control over how restaurants menu their items. Oceana admits this in a backhand fashion, saying in the report that the fraud numbers for Massachusetts are low due to the fact that most samples were from retail, and that retail stores generally label their products correctly.
Oceana is the NGO that ‘owns’ seafood mislabeling, relying on their mislabeling reports to get media attention. Other NGO’s have other brands. The competition among NGOs for media attention, donations, members, and activists can warp their approach to simple problems. So for Oceana, DNA testing and labeling is the path to improved seafood sustainability.
Oceana recognizes that stronger fishery management and enforcement globally would eliminate overfishing and IUU fishing, but can’t make that case because it is indistinguishable from what is also being recommended by the global seafood industry, governments, the FAO, and all others with a stake in long-term seafood sustainability.
This story originally appeared on Seafoodnews.com, a subscription site. It is reprinted with permission.