December 1, 2020 — Austen Brown started fishing commercially with his father off California’s coast when he was only 8 years old. By the time he was 13, Austen was making his own living as a fisherman, and he has spent the past few decades fishing for everything from codfish to shark. But perhaps his favorite target is the elusive swordfish. A popular choice among seafood diners, swordfish are most effectively caught using large drift gillnets that hang in the deep ocean.

The swordfish is also a favorite catch for Chris Williams, who has spent more than 40 years plying his commercial fishing trade off the California coast, including targeting swordfish with drift gillnets. Chris and his wife Dania usually sell his catch at Fresh Fish Fanatics, their family-owned business in Oxnard. The Williamses hope to one day leave the business to their three children, who have already begun helping to run it.

These stories are typical. Commercial fishing is often a family affair, with multiple generations working together to support a small business. And for those who love the freedom of the outdoors and the thrill of the hunt, fishing can provide a satisfying career. But recent California legislation threatens to eliminate the drift gillnet industry entirely.

In 2018, California approved a law designed to ban the use of drift gillnets by the year 2024. The law was championed by environmentalists who claim that drift gillnets pose a special risk to threatened sea creatures like whales and sea turtles. But they are mistaken. Existing federal and state regulations like seasonal closures and the required use of acoustic pingers on drift gillnets have already reduced accidental catch of protected species to almost nothing. But for some environmental hard-liners in Sacramento, a symbolic political victory is more important than facts on the ground (or in this case, in the water).

Read the full opinion piece at the Pacific Legal Foundation