Saving Seafood

  • Home
  • News
    • Alerts
    • Conservation & Environment
    • Council Actions
    • Economic Impact
    • Enforcement
    • International & Trade
    • Law
    • Management & Regulation
    • Regulations
    • Nutrition
    • Opinion
    • Other News
    • Safety
    • Science
    • State and Local
  • News by Region
    • New England
    • Mid-Atlantic
    • South Atlantic
    • Gulf of Mexico
    • Pacific
    • North Pacific
    • Western Pacific
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Fishing Terms Glossary

Proposed Red Snapper Amendment Criticized by LSU Scientist

WASHINGTON (Saving Seafood) — August 13, 2015 — Dr. James Cowan, Professor at the Department of Oceanography and Coastal Studies at Louisiana State University (LSU), has written a letter to the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council opposing the under-consideration Amendment 28 to the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan. Among other changes, Amendment 28 would transfer red snapper quota from the commercial fishery to the recreational fishery.

According to Dr. Cowan, “the notion that reallocation of red snapper from the commercial sector of the fishery to the recreational sector is a conservation measure is indefensible.” Instead, he notes that the key to maintaining a stable red snapper population is to ensure that there is a good year class every 5-7 years. He explains that one of the main problems currently facing the fishery is the lack of older fish, who produce more eggs and are thus more likely to contribute to producing new red snapper.

Dr. Cowan further criticizes the Amendment, noting that red snapper remains overfished, and that “raising [Annual Catch Limits], reallocation of more of the fishery to recreational sector, along with state management of the resource, will result in overfishing again within two to four years.” Given that current issues can be traced to a lack of older red snapper in the population, he notes, “there appears to be no justification” for reallocating quota to the recreational fishery. And because that fishery is more likely to target larger, older snapper, Dr. Cowan writes that, “I believe that the proposed reallocation will result in an increased risk of failure to reach the 2032 stock rebuilding target.”

Read the full letter from Dr. Cowan here

 

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11

Recent Headlines

  • Ocean Indicators We’re Tracking for El Niño’s Arrival on the West Coast
  • eDNA could play a bigger role in stock assessments
  • CALIFORNIA: El Niño bringing changes to Northern California ocean conditions and marine life
  • US Court Says Gulf of Mexico Fishery Council Has Too Much Power, but Overfishing Rule Can Stand
  • Western Pacific Scientists to Review Fishing Rules and Bottomfish Catch
  • US appeals court rejects challenge to turtle excluder device requirements in Louisiana
  • ALASKA: Seagrant launches Alaska Oyster Voyage interactive map and logging tool to encourage oyster consumption
  • Seafood Task Force launches first-of-its-kind tuna vessel monitoring program

Most Popular Topics

Alaska Aquaculture ASMFC Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission BOEM California China Climate change Coronavirus COVID-19 Donald Trump groundfish Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Hawaii IUU fishing Lobster Maine Massachusetts Mid-Atlantic National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NEFMC New Bedford New England New England Fishery Management Council New Jersey New York NMFS NOAA NOAA Fisheries North Atlantic right whales North Carolina North Pacific offshore energy Offshore wind Pacific right whales Salmon South Atlantic Virginia Western Pacific Whales wind energy Wind Farms
Tweets by @savingseafood

Copyright © 2026 Saving Seafood · WordPress Web Design by Jessee Productions