TOKYO (AP) — April 11, 2014 — The international court ruling against Japanese whaling last week may have given the government a convenient political out.
The Antarctic program was nearly bankrupt, but if the government had overhauled it on its own, it would have incurred the wrath of a strong anti-whaling lobby, and could have been criticized for caving in to foreign anti-whaling activists. Now officials can say the court forced their hand.
‘‘It seemed to me they were anxious to lose,’’ said Masayuki Komatsu, a former fisheries official known for his battles at the International Whaling Commission to defend Japanese hunts. He accused Japanese officials of losing ‘‘passion and love’’ for whaling and not fighting hard enough in court.
In a March 31 ruling, the International Court of Justice in The Hague ordered Japan to stop granting permits for its Antarctic whaling program, which allowed an annual cull of about 1,000 whales. The world court, upholding arguments made by Australia, rejected Japan’s contention that the program was scientific.
Though top Japanese officials called the ruling regrettable, they announced within hours that Japan would abide by it. A day later, the Fisheries Agency said Japan would skip the next Antarctic hunt.
‘‘We didn’t go to court in order to lose,’’ a government official close to the case said on condition of anonymity, because he isn’t authorized to speak publicly about the issue. ‘‘But it was obvious that the whaling program had to be changed.’’
In a way, the ruling was an example of ‘‘gaiatsu,’’ the external pressure that Japan has traditionally relied on to bring about change when vested interests are strong. It was the arrival of U.S. Commodore Matthew Perry and his warships that forced Japan to end a long period of isolation. More recently, gaiatsu (roughly pronounced gah-ee-aht-soo) has pushed market opening and deregulation of the economy.
Read the full story from the Associated Press at The Boston Globe