Saving Seafood

  • Home
  • News
    • Alerts
    • Conservation & Environment
    • Council Actions
    • Economic Impact
    • Enforcement
    • International & Trade
    • Law
    • Management & Regulation
    • Regulations
    • Nutrition
    • Opinion
    • Other News
    • Safety
    • Science
    • State and Local
  • News by Region
    • New England
    • Mid-Atlantic
    • South Atlantic
    • Gulf of Mexico
    • Pacific
    • North Pacific
    • Western Pacific
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Fishing Terms Glossary

Gloucester Times: We all play a role in limiting mercury pollution

April 27, 2017 — Mercury poses a dangerous threat to people and the environment, and northeastern Massachusetts has been tainted by higher-than-normal levels of the heavy metal. Those of us who live here — let alone catch and eat fish here — depend on efforts to contain the toxic element – including by making sure old thermostats, fluorescent bulbs and similar products don’t wind up in landfills.

But with shared interest comes shared responsibility, and none of us should need a financial reward to do the right thing for ourselves, each other or the environment.

That’s the suggestion of some green groups, however, when they criticize Massachusetts’ law on mercury disposal and an industry-organized effort to collect devices that contain the metal.

They point to incentives required by other New England states that force makers of thermostats and light bulbs to offer rewards to consumers and contractors to recycle old mercury products. In Maine, the rebate is $5.

Those programs come at a cost, either for the state and taxpayers or for manufacturers. And they don’t move the needle of recycling, according to industry representatives. It’s hard to imagine such small rebates swaying enough people to make a difference.

A spokesman for the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, in media reports when Massachusetts updated its mercury law two and a half years ago, derisively called the payments a “bounty.”

Read the full opinion piece at the Gloucester Times

Recent Headlines

  • Ocean Indicators We’re Tracking for El Niño’s Arrival on the West Coast
  • eDNA could play a bigger role in stock assessments
  • CALIFORNIA: El Niño bringing changes to Northern California ocean conditions and marine life
  • US Court Says Gulf of Mexico Fishery Council Has Too Much Power, but Overfishing Rule Can Stand
  • Western Pacific Scientists to Review Fishing Rules and Bottomfish Catch
  • US appeals court rejects challenge to turtle excluder device requirements in Louisiana
  • ALASKA: Seagrant launches Alaska Oyster Voyage interactive map and logging tool to encourage oyster consumption
  • Seafood Task Force launches first-of-its-kind tuna vessel monitoring program

Most Popular Topics

Alaska Aquaculture ASMFC Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission BOEM California China Climate change Coronavirus COVID-19 Donald Trump groundfish Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Hawaii IUU fishing Lobster Maine Massachusetts Mid-Atlantic National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NEFMC New Bedford New England New England Fishery Management Council New Jersey New York NMFS NOAA NOAA Fisheries North Atlantic right whales North Carolina North Pacific offshore energy Offshore wind Pacific right whales Salmon South Atlantic Virginia Western Pacific Whales wind energy Wind Farms
Tweets by @savingseafood

Copyright © 2026 Saving Seafood · WordPress Web Design by Jessee Productions