Saving Seafood

  • Home
  • News
    • Alerts
    • Conservation & Environment
    • Council Actions
    • Economic Impact
    • Enforcement
    • International & Trade
    • Law
    • Management & Regulation
    • Regulations
    • Nutrition
    • Opinion
    • Other News
    • Safety
    • Science
    • State and Local
  • News by Region
    • New England
    • Mid-Atlantic
    • South Atlantic
    • Gulf of Mexico
    • Pacific
    • North Pacific
    • Western Pacific
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Fishing Terms Glossary

A crisis in the water is decimating this once-booming fishing town

November 29, 2019 — His ancestors were Portuguese colonialists who settled on this otherworldly stretch of coast, wedged between a vast desert and the southern Atlantic. They came looking for the one thing this barren region had in abundance: fish.

By the time Mario Carceija Santos was getting into the fishing business half a century later, in the 1990s, Angola had won independence and the town of Tombwa was thriving. There were 20 fish factories strung along the bay, a constellation of churches and schools, a cinema hall built in art deco, and, in the central plaza, massive drying racks for the tons upon tons of fish hauled out of the sea.

Since then, Tombwa’s fortunes have plummeted; Santos’s factory is one of just two remaining. The cinema hall is shuttered. Kids run around town barefoot instead of going to school. The central plaza is overgrown by weeds, its statue of a proud fisherman covered in bird droppings.

Sea temperatures off the Angolan coast have warmed 1.5 degrees Celsius — and possibly more — in the past century, according to a Washington Post analysis of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data.

In recent years, multiple studies have identified the waters along Tombwa’s coast in particular as a fast-warming hot spot: In one independent analysis of satellite-based NOAA data, temperatures have risen nearly 2 degrees Celsius since 1982. That is more than three times the global average rate of ocean warming.

Read the full story at The Washington Post

Coast Guard: Catch misreported on 350 fishing trips

December 2, 2019 — The Northeast multispecies groundfishery may have been victimized by several misreporting schemes through a five-year period and “potentially up to 2.5 million pounds of regulated species were misreported by vessels from multiple sectors” in the fishery, according to a Coast Guard investigation of misreporting.

The report chronicling the Coast Guard investigation from 2011 to 2015 will be presented to the New England Fishery Management Council on Tuesday during the first of its three days of meetings in Newport, Rhode Island.

The Coast Guard presentation is one of two scheduled agenda items dealing with catch misreporting that will be before the council on Tuesday.

The same day, NOAA Fisheries’ Office of Law Enforcement is scheduled to make a presentation to the council specifically on misreporting uncovered during the criminal case brought against now-incarcerated New Bedford fishing mogul Carlos Rafael.

In its 21-page report, the Coast Guard said the analysis by its Boston-based First District enforcement staff identified more than 350 vessel trips during the period of 2011 to 2015 in the Northeast multispecies groundfishery “where there appears to be evidence of misreporting.”

Read the full story at the Gloucester Daily Times

Carlos Rafael Inks $25 Million Deal with Blue Harvest Fisheries

November 29, 2019 — The highly-anticipated forced sell-off of “Codfather” Carlos Rafael’s fishing fleet appears to be near completion, only months after the convicted criminal unloaded his scallop boats.

Undercurrent News reports that Blue Harvest Fisheries has inked a $25 million deal to buy at least 35 vessels and skiffs from Rafael along with their permits and fishing quotas. Blue Harvest maintains fleets in Fairhaven and in Newport News, Virginia. It is backed by Bregal Partners, a New York City-based private equity firm.

The pending deal with Blue Harvest – which still must survive a “right of first refusal” where other harvesters could step forward – comes as Rafael remains behind bars.

Rafael was arrested in 2016 following a federal sting, and was convicted on 28 criminal counts in 2017. Rafael admitted to raking in illegal profits and gaming the system by mislabeling 700,000 pounds of harvested fish over four years. He also illegally avoided paying taxes. Rafael was sentenced to 46 months in federal prison. To settle a separate civil suit with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, he was forced to sell his fishing fleet, pay $3 million in penalties, and never engage in the world of commercial fishing again.

Read the full story at WBSM

US fisheries sees first IP-based broadband terminal and vessel monitoring

November 26, 2019 — An estimated 4,000 legally licensed commercial fishing vessels are permitted to fish in US Fisheries Management regions. These are required to report their GPS positions via a type-approved secure satellite link.

As explained, iFleetONE VMS is the first mobile satellite terminal to provide secure VMS services for NMFS with full-featured voice and IP-based communications capabilities.

In addition, it is expected, for the first time, to enable every stakeholder in the VMS ecosystem, including NMFS Law Enforcement, fisheries management officials and other end users to have a platform to develop new and previously limited applications.

As such, this terminal and VMS combination is expected to transform regulatory compliance, fisheries governance in US waters to sustain fish numbers and protect ocean habitats, explained Inmarsat’s Eric Griffin, VP for Offshore & Fishing.

Read the full story at Safety4Sea

Deadly life at sea: UN partners spotlight depths of danger in fishing industry

November 22, 2019 — The following was released by the United Nations:

“Every hour fishers die doing their job – not just men, women too”, Maria Helena Samedo, chief for Climate and Natural Resources at the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), explained at a major conference organized by the agency in Rome, coinciding with World Fisheries Day on 21 November.

“Human rights violations and unacceptable practices at different stages of the value chain are increasing in fisheries and aquaculture”, she added.

Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing leads to over-exploitation of fish stocks, already drained by pollution and climate impacts, and financially burdens honest fishers and the communities that depend on them, FAO and the International Labour Organisation (ILO)  said  in a joint statement at the conclusion of the International Symposium on Fisheries Sustainability.

Beyond injuring biodiversity and economies, IUU casts a dark shadow on already physically-taxing sea labour, with many IUU fishers engaging in transnational crimes, such as human and drug trafficking and piracy.

Read the full release here

FCF Fishery in talks to purchase Bumble Bee: Bloomberg

November 21, 2019 — In the wake of rumors about Bumble Bee Foods potentially filing for bankruptcy, and that that filing could come this week, the company appears to be in talks with Fong Chun Formosa (FCF) Fishery Company regarding a possible buy-out.

The story, reported by Bloomberg, indicates that FCF would be a “stalking-horse bidder” in the bankruptcy reorganization. Stalking-horse bidders set a low-end bidding bar, which any other companies interested in buying Bumble Bee would then have to either match or exceed.

Read the full story at Seafood Source

JOHN SACKTON: The Winding Glass: Can we stop IUU fishing by thinking outside the box?

November 21, 2019 — SEAFOOD NEWS — Campaigns against IUU fishing by both the industry and environmentalists continually run up against a problem:  government enforcement.

Enforcement is not as much of an issue for rich countries with well-developed fisheries management systems, and strong enforcement histories.

In these cases, when IUU fishing happens, it can be successfully exposed, prosecuted and ended.

For example, in 2012, three Scottish fish factories and 27 skippers pleaded guilty and were fined more than £1 million for illegally harvesting mackerel in excess of EU quotas.

Carlos Rafael, the largest owner of scallop vessels in New Bedford, went to jail in 2017 over falsifying sales records to hide illegal landings.

Similar enforcement has happened in Australia, New Zealand, Norway, Japan, France and elsewhere.

But too often governments are not able to effectively enforce against IUU, either because of lack of will, lack of resources, or simply poor ability to manage fisheries.

Our story today about the Vaquita porpoise in Mexico is a case in point.  Although Mexico is part of an international agreement to close fishing in the Northern Gulf of California, vessels were detected fishing in the closed zone this month.

The response of the UN CITES commission is to monitor the situation and take another look in 2020, a year from now.

There is another way we might approach IUU fishing, using supply chains to bypass governments that are ineffective or too weak to prevent the mixing of legal and illegal catch.

That is a blockchain system.  Last week at the International Coldwater Prawn Forum in St. John’s, Dan McQuade, Marketing Director for Raw Seafoods, a scallop company operating out of Fall River, MA, presented the blockchain system his company developed in partnership with IBM.

It was one of the clearest examples of a blockchain that I had seen.

Block I represents each scallop bag processed onboard a boat.  It is tagged with a printed label giving information on time and date, where caught, boat name, and other parameters as needed, even hold temperature.

Block 2 represents the receiving of this at the scallop packing plant.  Scallops are graded, repacked for distribution either at foodservice or retail.   Block 2 incorporates the link to Block 1, but details processing date, grade, size, license no., etc.

Block 3 represents the distributor, in this illustration, Santa Monica Seafoods.  This tag includes the date received, location, size, and date shipped to their customer.

Block 4 represents the restaurant, which includes date received, size, sell-by date if any, and various consumer marketing materials.

By scanning a QR code, the restaurant customer (or any participant in the supply chain) can bring up all the connected information at each step in the process.  The blockchain is in effect a guarantee that the original raw, untreated scallop, was never mixed with treated or adulterated scallops during its passage through the supply chain.

The technology of the blockchain involves public and private key cryptography, which makes it impossible to alter any of the blocks in the chain, once they are registered.

Raw Seafoods is promoting this as a marketing strategy with IBM to increase customer trust and satisfaction with their all-natural scallops.

But imagine a similar system applied to an area with significant IUU fishing, such as the upper Gulf of California.

In this case, fishing co-ops would be the originators of the first block, detailing product, date caught, and location.  Processors and receivers would be the second block, detailing date received, product, pack, ship date.  Importers to the US would be the 3rd block, again showing date received, customs data if needed, size, count, pack etc.  The buyer, whether a retail or foodservice user of shrimp would be the 4th block, registering the product into their system.

The cost of this would include computers, printers, bar code readers, the cloud computing services, and programming necessary to make it work.  But once in place, it is scalable at a remarkably low cost.  The transaction cost for the entire supply chain could likely be reduced to one or two cents per lb.

Obviously, the system relies on each party putting accurate information into their block.  However, because the record is permanent and instantly traceable, it lends itself to low-cost audits as needed.  For example, if the fishing co-op itself were suspected of laundering illegal catch, data controls like GPS location and date could be added, to make this more difficult.

When IUU fish or shrimp is comingled with legal product, it becomes infinitely harder to track.

The benefit to fighting IUU fishing is that the blockchain tag could become a buying or importing requirement into the US.  This would not eliminate IUU fishing going to underground or other markets, but it would allow non-government entities to provide the resources to control their own supply chain requirements.

Implementation of a system like this in an area with high IUU fishing would not depend on government enforcement action but instead would use the blockchain technology to validate the product from its point of harvest right through to its point of consumption.

This would allow buyers to actually avoid purchasing fish or shrimp that had co-mingled IUU product.

Enforcement to require only legal product, like with toothfish, for example, can be quite successful at reducing and eliminating IUU fishing.  With toothfish, it took years of concerted action by both the legal toothfish industry, governments in the fishing nations, a UN port state agreement and backlisting of IUU vessels, and US laws regulating imports of toothfish.  There simply is not the money or will in the international community to replicate this wherever IUU fishing is taking place.

Investment in a blockchain designed to reduce or eliminate IUU fishing from a regional hot spot could be a far less costly technological solution that does not depend on the enforcement budget of the governments involved.

However, it would depend on the commitment of the legal fishing parties at all levels of the supply chain.  Unless the harvesters at the first level buy into the system, it will not work.  But here, the provision of incentives would be far less costly than a broken enforcement system.

As these chains begin to be implemented for marketing purposes, it may be worthwhile to explore what a real IUU focused blockchain would look like as an alternative to the painstaking diplomatic process of governments convincing each other that they have to spend the resources and act.

This story was originally published on SeafoodNews.com, a subscription site. It is reprinted with permission.

EJF study finds child labor, illegal fishing issues within Vietnamese fleet

November 20, 2019 — A new report by the Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF) details of illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing practices and child labor – from children as young as 11 – in distant water fishing vessels.

The report, titled “Caught in the net,” surveyed 239 crew from 41 Vietnamese fishing vessels that had been detained while fishing illegally in Thai waters. According to the report, which has been picked up by some international media, fishermen from Vietnam have been forced to travel outside their own waters due to the lack of any resources in their own country.

Read the full story at Seafood Source

New tool helps fisheries enforcement track criminal fishing around the world

November 19, 2019 — A new online tool maps vessels that have fished illegally or committed other crimes at sea, giving fishery managers and enforcement officials another way to keep tabs on illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing.

Spyglass, which contains records for nearly 3,700 vessels and 1,200 companies so far, aims to document which vessels are the highest risk for IUU fishing so that they can be stopped.

Read the full story at Seafood Source

Report: ICCAT bluefin rules leave loopholes for IUU

November 15, 2019 — A new report, recently published on ResearchGate, has found that the current catch documentation method for Atlantic bluefin tuna used by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas leaves large loopholes that can be exploited by fishers catching more than what is allowed, allowing them to have illicit catch enter E.U. markets.

The report, funded by the WWF, is focused exclusively on the eastern bluefin tuna stock. It comes in the wake of the 2018 bluefin tuna trade scandal, which found an illicit trade network selling large amounts of illegally harvested bluefin tuna in Europe. A complex, multi-organization investigation that included the Spanish Guardia Civil and EUROPOL – dubbed Operation Tarantelo – discovered that the illicit trade of illegal bluefin tuna catch had been occurring for years. The trade involved most of the countries in the northern Mediterranean, with illegal bluefin tuna coming from Maltese farms and Italian fishing boats. One of the largest Spanish tuna farming operators, Ricardo Fuentes y Hijos, was found to be the mastermind behind the trade on the Spanish side, and used a number of companies to issue false ICCAT bluefin catch documentation. The volume of the resulting illicit trade was estimated to be around 2,500 metric tons a year, which would have represented 18.6 percent of the total quota for the E.U. in 2017.

Read the full story at Seafood Source

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • …
  • 68
  • Next Page »

Recent Headlines

  • Scientists did not recommend a 54 percent cut to the menhaden TAC
  • Broad coalition promotes Senate aquaculture bill
  • Chesapeake Bay region leaders approve revised agreement, commit to cleanup through 2040
  • ALASKA: Contamination safeguards of transboundary mining questioned
  • Federal government decides it won’t list American eel as species at risk
  • US Congress holds hearing on sea lion removals and salmon predation
  • MASSACHUSETTS: Seventeen months on, Vineyard Wind blade break investigation isn’t done
  • Sea lions keep gorging on endangered salmon despite 2018 law

Most Popular Topics

Alaska Aquaculture ASMFC Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission BOEM California China Climate change Coronavirus COVID-19 Donald Trump groundfish Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Illegal fishing IUU fishing Lobster Maine Massachusetts Mid-Atlantic National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NEFMC New Bedford New England New England Fishery Management Council New Jersey New York NMFS NOAA NOAA Fisheries North Atlantic right whales North Carolina North Pacific offshore energy Offshore wind Pacific right whales Salmon South Atlantic Virginia Western Pacific Whales wind energy Wind Farms

Daily Updates & Alerts

Enter your email address to receive daily updates and alerts:
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Tweets by @savingseafood

Copyright © 2025 Saving Seafood · WordPress Web Design by Jessee Productions