Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Archives

Feds now question their own approval of New England Wind

October 29, 2026 — New England Wind is the latest offshore wind project in the federal government’s crosshairs.

In response to a lawsuit spearheaded by Nantucket-based nonprofit ACK for Whales, federal officials are asking a judge to allow them to reconsider their approval of the project about 24 miles southwest of Nantucket.

In an Oct. 20 court filing responding to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, the Department of the Interior agreed with ACK for Whales saying that its previous approval did not adequately explain how the project would comply with requirements protecting the environment, fishing and navigation.

“This filing by DOI is significant in our efforts to protect the environment around Nantucket from the damaging impacts of large scale offshore wind development,” ACK for Whales member Veronica Bonnet said.

The government is asking the court to send the project’s construction and operations plan back for further review under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.

Read the full article at The Inquirer and Mirror

The Permitting Bill Fishermen Can’t Afford to Ignore

October 29, 2026 — On November 9, the Senate is scheduled to take up the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026, known as BAAJA (S. 5653). This legislation is not about Mexican sheep; instead, the dense 400-page bill rewrites how the federal government approves energy, mining, and infrastructure projects. Its sponsors, Senators Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Mike Lee (R-UT), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Martin Heinrich (D-NM), call it a historic compromise. I call it a historic risk for fishing communities.

The coalition behind BAAJA is unusual. The American Petroleum Institute (oil and gas), the American Clean Power Association (wind and other renewables), and major organized labor groups support it. Tribal nations, historic preservation groups, and ocean conservation organizations oppose it.

Commercial fishermen have been mostly absent from this fight, and that needs to change. BAAJA rewrites the rules for offshore wind farms, export cables, offshore oil and gas, and seabed mining. It changes how those projects are approved, how long the approvals last, and how hard they are to challenge. Nearly every change reduces the leverage fishermen have used to protect fishing grounds historically, and that’s not a coincidence.

The Senate outcome is close to being settled. The House is a different story, and that is where fishermen still have a real opening. But we must make our voices heard, and soon.

What this issue is about

Fishermen have spent more than a decade fighting for a real voice in offshore wind decisions. Lease areas have been granted on productive fishing grounds over industry objections, and project layouts have been set with little regard for how fleets actually fish or what they need for safe transit. Too often, fishermen’s concerns have been treated as a box to check rather than a reason to change course.

BAAJA would shrink what voice fishermen have left in the regulatory process for energy permitting. Its supporters pitch it as protection for clean energy, pointing to the 2025 federal stop-work orders that halted offshore wind projects already holding permits. The bill delivers that protection by making permits nearly impossible to revisit once they are issued, and much harder to challenge before then during the planning process.

The bill doesn’t stop at wind. Its “protections” for energy projects from public scrutiny and challenge cover any federally permitted project with a private sector sponsor, including offshore oil and gas wells and mines. The same rules that would wall off a wind farm from fishermen’s objections would wall off an offshore drilling lease or a seabed mining permit.

Third deep sea mining lawsuit filed as Trump administration seeks Samoa lease sale

October 26, 2026 — The Trump administration last week published its notice finalizing the first deep-sea mining lease sale of over 31 million acres of seabed off of American Samoa on Nov. 19.

Nonprofit environmental law firm Earthjustice filed a lawsuit that same afternoon seeking to block it, representing Faleula o le Manu‘atele, a council of Samoan leaders, and Fa‘asao Amerika Samoa and Conservation Council for Hawai‘i.

Samoa’s lease sale will proceed about a month before the Dec. 16 mineral lease auction that the Trump administration wants to do for about 67 million acres of seafloor surrounding the Marianas.

Read the full article at Pacific Daily News

Opinion: Reopen the investigation of the F/V Mistress

October 1, 2026 — The fishing vessel Mistress sank in the early hours of Jan. 1, 2019. Two of its three crew members were lost. More than seven years later, a private dive team documented a wreck believed to be the Mistress, roughly 50 feet from Turbine 1 at the Block Island Wind Farm.

That location deserves attention. In its mayday call, the crew said the vessel was “right below the Block Island Wind Farm.” A Coast Guard helicopter searched near the coordinates of the final distress signal but then abandoned a hover search after about half an hour amid poor visibility, low clouds, “windmills,” and high winds.

The team making the recent discovery used the mayday coordinates, the Coast Guard’s investigative report, and rumored accounts from mariners and divers to narrow its search. Side-scan sonar revealed wreckage just east of Turbine 1. Divers documented features and equipment that match photographs of the Mistress in the Coast Guard report. They also found what appear to be human remains among the wheelhouse debris.

The wreck was not the first indication of boat debris near the turbine. A BOEM-sponsored survey reported seeing “partial boat debris (e.g., paneling from a small boat hull)” around Turbine 1 in 2019, although it claims no footage was obtained. Why was that observation apparently never connected to the loss of the Mistress?

The new sonar image also shows a maintenance barge beside the turbine, with its legs or “spuds” planted close to the wreckage. Given the recurring maintenance activity at Turbine 1 since 2019, investigators should determine what seabed checks were performed, what operators observed, and whether earlier work disturbed the site.

Read the full article at The New Bedford Light

VIRGINIA: Comment period closes on proposed Virginia offshore mineral lease

August 26, 2026 — The public comment period has closed on a proposal that could lead to commercial mineral leasing in federal waters off Virginia’s Eastern Shore.

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management accepted comments through Aug. 22 on a request for information and interest covering about 1.77 million acres, or 2,764 square miles, of the Outer Continental Shelf. The area lies three to 63.5 miles off the Delmarva Peninsula, seaward of Accomack and Northampton counties, in water depths ranging from approximately 30′ to 410′.

The proceeding is an early planning step and does not authorize exploration, dredging or mineral production. BOEM will use the submissions to determine whether to identify areas for possible leasing and begin an environmental review. Any lease would be awarded through a competitive process rather than directly to the company that initiated the request.

Odyssey Marine Exploration, Tampa, Fla., submitted the unsolicited lease-sale request in November 2025. The company is interested in exploring for heavy mineral sands containing titanium-bearing minerals, zirconium-bearing minerals and rare earth element-bearing minerals, including monazite. Odyssey has a collaboration agreement with Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corp., Houston, which would serve as the dredging contractor if the project advances.

Unlike proposed mining projects targeting polymetallic nodules in deep ocean basins, the Virginia proposal involves comparatively shallow continental shelf deposits that Odyssey says could be recovered using conventional dredging and mineral-processing equipment.

Read the full article at National Fisherman

Environmental review of seabed mining to come after leases are sold

August 25, 2026 — The federal agency pushing to open the seabed near the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to mineral mining confirmed Saturday that it will not conduct a full environmental study of the actual mining process until after companies already hold leases, a disclosure that has done little to ease objections from Guam senators.

The Marine Minerals Administration, formerly the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, responded to questions from The Guam Daily Post about its decision to publish a proposed leasing notice for the Marianas sale, known as PACM-2, three months ahead of the schedule the agency had previously given Congress.

Asked why it moved up the notice, the agency said the release “reflects the agency’s response to executive orders that prioritize the development and secure supply of critical minerals.” The agency apologized for the delay in responding to the Post but did not elaborate further on the shift in timing.

On environmental review, the agency confirmed that the leasing stage only grants companies the right to hold a lease and conduct preliminary work such as bathymetric, geological and geophysical surveys, which it maintains carry no significant environmental impact. A full environmental impact statement, the agency said, will wait until “a lessee submits detailed plans with more precise details regarding the location, equipment size, scale, and specific methodologies for developing the seabed resources.”

Read the full article at The Guam Daily Post

Governor, Moylan push back on seabed mining plan

August 21, 2026 — The federal government has taken its clearest step yet toward opening the seabed near the Northern Mariana Islands to commercial mineral mining, and Guam’s governor and delegate to Congress are warning Washington not to move faster than the science allows.

The Marine Minerals Administration, formed in July when the Interior Department folded the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management into a new agency, published a proposed leasing notice Monday covering five lease blocks along the edge of the Mariana Trench. The blocks span roughly 67 million acres, an area close to the size of Nevada, and the agency has set Dec. 16 as the proposed date for the sale.

In a statement released Wednesday, Gov. Lou Leon Guerrero’s office acknowledged Washington’s interest in reducing reliance on foreign mineral sources but said caution should come first. “National security cannot mean asking the people of the Pacific to accept environmental risks before those risks are fully understood,” the statement said.

The governor’s office cautioned that permitting exploration now could make it harder to pull back later, once companies have invested money in surveying the seabed. “A lease is not authorization to begin commercial mining, and it is important that we be precise about that. But it is also not an insignificant step,” the statement said, calling on the Interior Department and the new marine minerals agency to consult with residents of the Mariana Islands before going further.

Read the full article at The Guam Daily Post

Court order could threaten permits for surviving US wind projects

August 19, 2026 — A court decision remanding prior approvals for a wind energy project off New Jersey could pose a new threat to offshore turbine arrays under construction, as the Trump administration presses its relentless campaign against them.

The Aug. 10 decision by U.S. District Court Judge Jia Cobb in the District of Columbia granted a request by the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to reconsider its permitting for Atlantic Shores, planned as a 2.8 gigawatt project near Long Beach Island, N.J.

Local activist group Save Long Beach Island had sought a remand and reconsideration of the project’s construction and operations plan, approved in October 2024 in the waning days of the Biden administration.

Save LBI contended that BOEM failed to adequately consider the project’s likely effects under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, Endangered Species Act and National Environmental Policy Act, among other federal laws.

Read the full article at WorkBoat

Trump admin to reconsider permits for Atlantic Shores wind project

August 13, 2026 — In the latest blow to the offshore wind industry, a federal court has cleared the way for the Trump administration to reconsider permits for the Atlantic Shores project off the coast of New Jersey.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled Monday that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management could review the construction permits it issued to the project. The permits were issued under the Biden administration.

“Remand is appropriate here in the interest of judicial economy and in light of the lack of prejudice to Atlantic Shores,” the order read.

Read the full article at E&E News

ALASKA: Deep sea mining in the Gulf of Alaska

August 13, 2026 — With China reportedly producing around 90 percent of the world’s supply of rare earth elements, and far ahead in processing technology, the U.S. and other countries are searching for new ways to meet demand, and deep sea mining on seamounts in the Gulf of Alaska is on the list of proposals. The Japanese press reported in July that experimental deep sea mining had successfully extracted rare earth elements such as neodymium, dysprosium, and terbium—all vital for fighter jet and missile guidance systems—from 6,000 feet below the surface.

In April of 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14285 “Unleashing America’s Offshore Critical Minerals and Resources,” and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is evaluating whether to advance a competitive lease sale for minerals on the Alaska Outer Continental Shelf. “We don’t know what impact deep sea mining could have on fisheries, but there is cause for concern,” says retired University of Alaska marine professor Rick Steiner, who now runs a consulting company called Oasis Earth.

Read the full article at National Fisherman