Saving Seafood

Maine lobster harvest topped 100m lbs again

January 23, 2019 — The Maine Department of Marine Resources is still auditing its 2018 lobster catch and won’t issue a report until February, but department spokesperson Jeff Nichols has reportedly confirmed that the US state landed more than 100 million lbs for the eighth year in a row.

Speaking at the National Fisheries Institute’s Global Seafood Market Conference, in San Diego, California, last week, Keith Moores, president of Gloucester, Massachusetts-based frozen seafood supplier J.W. Bryce, estimated that Maine’s 4,500 harvesters landed about 119m lbs of lobster in 2018, an 8m lb increase over 2017, the Portland (Maine) Press Herald reported.

Read the full story at Undercurrent News

Restaurant trends emphasize fast casual, but seafood playing catch-up

January 22, 2019 — Trends indicate that Americans are spending more and more of their money on eating out, and an increasing proportion of the ever-larger restaurant spend is being done at fast-casual establishments.

Starting in 2010, Americans’ total spending on food away-from-home started to pull away from spending on food prepared and eaten at home, to the point that Americans spent USD 100 billion (EUR 88 billion) more on eating out in 2017 than on food at home.

“Food away from home started taking up [more of peoples’] food budgets,” Richard Barry, program manager for the National Fisheries Institute, at last week’s Global Seafood Market Conference in Coronado, California.

Among that dining-out experience, one restaurant segment saw the most explosive growth: Chain quick-service restaurants, also known as “fast casual” restaurants. Even during the 2007 to 2009 recession, the segment added thousands of new locations, and in 2015 the segment had more than 200,000 restaurants across the country, up from just over 150,000 in 2005.

“The big driver behind the foodservice segment is these chain quick-service restaurants,” Barry said.

Read the full story at Seafood Source

Americans eating a lot more seafood, according to NFI’s new Top 10 list

December 14, 2018 — Americans ate over a pound more seafood per capita in 2017 than they did the year before, according to the latest figures shared in the National Fisheries Institute’s (NFI) annual list of the top 10 most consumed seafood species in the United States.

In 2017, Americans consumed 16 pounds of seafood per capita, an increase of 1.1 pounds from 2016 – a considerable hike, said NFI President John Connelly.

“More than a pound increase is substantial,” Connelly said in a prepared statement.

The pound-plus increase wasn’t the only eye-opening figure presented in this year’s list, either, Connelly noted. The new numbers suggest that seafood consumption in the United States may be diversifying beyond the usual suspects, he said.

Read the full story at Seafood Source

 

Studies: Omega-3s temper premature births, heart attacks

November 21, 2018 — New research linking omega-3 fatty acids with a reduced risk of cardiovascular diseases as well as the reduction of dangerous premature births is expected to have benefits for the seafood industry.

In a study of people who took Lovaza, a prescription omega-3 fish oil, researchers found that subjects were 28 percent less likely to suffer heart attacks than those taking a placebo. Additionally, people who ate fewer than 1.5 servings of fish weekly reduced their risk of cardiovascular disease by 19 percent when taking Lovaza.

The research was presented at the recent American Heart Association 2018 Scientific Sessions in Chicago, Illinois, and published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

“The use of fish oil did not significantly reduce risk for those eating more seafood, but the average overall showed a reduced risk,” Dr. Tom Brenna, a professor of pediatrics, chemistry, and nutrition at the University of Texas in Austin, Texas, and chair of Seafood Nutrition Partnership’s Scientific and Nutrition Advisory Council, told SeafoodSource. “The message here is, ‘If you don’t eat fish, take supplements.'”

Alongside the Lovaza study, a new Cochrane Review of 70 studies worldwide found that omega-3 fatty acids reduced dangerous preterm births by 42 percent.

The extensive review of published studies, which included 20,000 pregnant women, also revealed an 11 percent reduction in preterm births, and a 10 percent reduction in risk of having a low-birthweight baby. The researchers reviewed studies involving fish oil supplements as well as seafood.

“This study is further evidence that health professionals should be actively promoting fish and omega-3s among pregnant women as they have possibly the most to gain from eating more fish,” Jennifer McGuire, a registered dietitian for the National Fisheries Institute, told SeafoodSource.

Read the full story at Seafood Source

 

NFI Future Leaders seek donations for SeaShare

October 23, 2018 — The National Fisheries Institute’s Future Leaders program is seeking donations for SeaShare, a non-profit organized to enable the U.S. seafood industry to donate food and resources to hunger-relief efforts nationwide.

The Future Leaders program, founded and run by the seafood industry’s trade group, is designed to craft and promote young leaders in the industry through a year-long training program.

SeaShare Director of Development Kate Tomkins said the Future Leaders have conducted a SeaShare giving campaign since 2011.

“Like Future Leaders, SeaShare really represents the seafood industry, is aligned with seafood industry, and we both see ourselves as extensions of the industry giving back for hunger-relief,” Tomkins said.

Founded in 1994 and based in Bainbridge Island, Washington, U.S.A., near Seattle, SeaShare annually organizes the donation of more than two million pounds of seafood to food banks in as many as 30 states across the United States. Tomkins said in addition to seafood, the organization also accepts in-kind donations of cold storage and transportation, and has nearly 200 partners throughout the supply chain helping to get seafood to food banks.

“We want to continue to bring more seafood to more people throughout the country,” Tomkins said. “There are 42 million Americans who struggle with hunger. That number has not significantly changed since the end of the last financial crisis. People are still really struggling to meet their own basic needs, and we believe everyone should have access to highest-quality protein that’s out there.”

Read the full story at Seafood Source

NFI president: American jobs are fueled by international trade in seafood

September 13, 2018 — The US’ National Fisheries Institute (NFI) has joined ‘Americans for Free Trade’, a multi-industry coalition aimed at opposing tariffs and highlighting the benefits of international trade.

Over 80 US trade associations representing thousands of businesses and workers announced the formation of the group, which will immediately join Farmers for Free Trade, the coalition backed by the nation’s largest ag commodity groups, in a multi-million dollar national campaign called Tariffs Hurt the Heartland.

The campaign will focus on telling the stories of the American businesses, farmers, workers and families harmed by tariffs through town-hall style events, grassroots outreach to Congress and the administration, social media, rapid response and digital advertising.

The campaign includes a geographically searchable map (TariffsHurt.com) that allows users to find stories of job losses, deferred investments, higher prices and other negative consequences for farmers and businesses in communities across the country impacted by tariffs.

Read the full story at Undercurrent News

Massive Industry Lobbying Campaign ‘Tariffs Hurt the Heartland’ Begins; NFI Key Sponsor

September 13, 2018 — SEAFOOD NEWS — From California apple growers to Maine lobstermen, businesses are joining forces to try to persuade President Trump that tariffs are hurting U.S. industries.

On Wednesday, organizations representing thousands of companies in industries including retailing, toy manufacturing, farming and technology plan to announce they are cooperating on a lobbying campaign called Tariffs Hurt the Heartland to oppose tariffs on imports.

Furthermore, the National Fisheries Institute, the largest U.S. seafood trade association, is organizing a day this month when members will fly to Washington to talk to members of Congress and the Trump administration. Others coming to Washington include seafood importers from Texas and seafood processors from Minnesota.

It is the latest sign that businesses are ratcheting up lobbying against tariffs that the Trump administration has imposed, or is considering, as Mr. Trump says he will defend American manufacturing jobs. As of June 30, nearly 450 entities employed lobbyists on trade issues—up from about 160 at the start of the year and about 100 when Mr. Trump took office, according to lobbying-disclosure reports compiled by the nonprofit Center for Responsive Politics.

Few policy fights have triggered as big a jump in lobbying activity, although there are more lobbyists overall engaged on perennial issues such as taxes and health care. Some businesses are concerned about rising costs of imported materials; others, particularly farmers, about retaliatory tariffs imposed by China and Europe on U.S. exports.

At the Iowa State Fair last month, a lobbying group backed by the American Farm Bureau handed out “I Support Free Trade” buttons and urged farmers to sign posters proclaiming their opposition to tariffs.

Car manufacturers, auto dealers and vehicle parts makers together plan to run a campaign opposing new tariffs on the industry. And last week, the trade association for retailers including Target Corp. and Walmart Inc. brought 150 small retailers to meetings with lawmakers to talk about how tariffs could hurt their businesses.

“Every trade group is much busier because there’s a lot more activity across all aspects of what trade groups do,” said Steve Orava, who leads the international trade practice at law firm King & Spalding in Washington.

Not all industry groups oppose Mr. Trump’s tariffs. The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, which represents U.S. ranchers and beef producers, backs the president’s tough trade stance. “We support the president’s overall goal of tearing down trade barriers; we support trying to take them on,” said association spokesman Max Moncaster. China and the European Union currently ban imports of U.S. beef raised with hormones.

And some industries benefit from import duties. Domestic steel companies support Mr. Trump’s tariffs on foreign steel, which have boosted prices and profits.

But most trade-focused lobbying this year has been against tariffs. When the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative took testimony on proposed tariffs in August, a majority of the industry representatives who participated said tariffs would hurt their businesses.

In a letter they plan to send to Congress on Wednesday, business groups will announce their latest effort to make the case against tariffs. The group’s multimillion-dollar Tariffs Hurt the Heartland campaign aims to tell the stories of farmers and business ownersdinged by import duties.

“Every sector of the U.S. economy stands to lose in a trade war,” said Matthew Shay, president of the National Retail Federation. The goal of the campaign is to “ensure Washington understands the real-world consequences of a trade war.”

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, the Business Roundtable and the Koch brothersare running their own lobbying efforts to promote free trade.

The Trump administration is expected soon to impose tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese imports, on top of tariffs already in effect on $50 billion in goods from China. Mr. Trump has suggested even more duties are in the offing.

The U.S. has also placed tariffs on steel and aluminum imports and is conducting trade negotiations with Europe, Mexico and Canada. China, the EU and other trade partners have announced tariffs of their own on American goods.

The unusual mechanism Mr. Trump is using to impose the tariffs has meant that many lobbyists can’t rely on the usual playbook. For most big policy changes in Washington, such as last year’s tax bill, Congress writes and votes on legislation, a drawn-out process that gives industries many opportunities to weigh in.

In this case, Mr. Trump is using an obscure part of trade law that permits him to impose tariffs unilaterally, sometimes in the name of national security. That is why many of the industries seeking to roll back or avoid tariffs are targeting the Trump administration alone.

Earlier this year, comedian Ben Stein starred in ads calling tariffs “B-A-D economics.” The ads, sponsored by retail lobbying group the National Retail Federation, ran on a favorite show of Mr. Trump’s, “Fox & Friends” on Fox News.

Farmers for Free Trade, hoping to catch Mr. Trump’s eye, has run its ads mostly in Washington, as well as in the Palm Beach, Fla., media market when Mr. Trump is staying at his Mar-a-Lago resort there. The group also has identified 10 states that will be important to Mr. Trump’s re-election and is highlighting stories of farmers who would be hurt by his trade policies.

When Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross last month visited Fargo, N.D., to discuss the impact of tariffs, the farmers’ group greeted him with a string of roadside billboards that read: “Secretary Ross, Tariffs Hurt ND Farmers.”

The Maine Lobster Dealers Association is agitating, too, saying tariffs will hit them harder than others because reciprocal tariffs imposed on the lobsters they sell to China don’t apply to lobsters sold in China by Canadian lobstermen, even though the lobsters are harvested from the same Atlantic waters.

“These guys want to sell lobsters, they don’t want to be wasting their time lobbying members of Congress,” said Annie Tselikis, the executive director of the Maine Lobster Dealers’ Association.

This story originally appeared on SeafoodNews.com, a subscription site. It is reprinted with permission.

National Fisheries Institute joins US business-backed campaign against tariffs

September 13, 2018 — The National Fisheries Institute has joined around 80 other U.S. trade associations in a coordinated campaign to oppose tariffs and other barriers to free trade.

The multi-industry coalition, Americans for Free Trade, on Wedneday, 12 September, launched a multi-million dollar national campaign titled Tariffs Hurt the Heartland. The campaign is aimed at members of the U.S. Congress and the general public and will tell stories of American businesses, farmers, workers, and families being hurt by the recently imposed tariffs. It will include events in congressional districts across the country; paid television, radio, and online advertisements; a “rapid-response war room” that will fact check and respond to tariff announcements; a digital and traditional media campaign including op-eds, blogs, and press statements on tariff-related issues; and direct outreach to key members of Congress “on behalf of grassroots voices from across the nation,” according to the newly-formed organization.

“American jobs are fueled by international trade in seafood,” NFI President John Connelly said in a press release. “Without access to seafood imports from important markets like China, or if these products become too expensive, jobs here in the U.S. will pay the price.”

Partners in the campaign include the National Retail Federation, Farmers for Free Trade, Retail Industry Leaders, the Consumer Technology Association, the American Apparel and Footwear Association, and the National Marine Manufacturers Association. A full list of participating organizations can be seen at the campaign’s website, AmericansforFreeTrade.com.

Read the full story at Seafood Source

Tariffs throw wrench into seafood supply chain

September 6, 2018 — Many seafood processors, fishermen and support businesses have been watching with increasing dismay as the trade war between U.S. and China heats up and impacts billions of dollars in trade.

In March, President Donald Trump’s administration announced its intention to levy tariffs against China in connection with “unfair” trade practices, including theft of intellectual property. When the first round of tariffs on Chinese products were announced, the seafood industry hoped to escape the list of impacted items.

That hope faded when a host of seafood products were included on the list of proposed retaliatory tariffs from the Chinese government. Then Office of the U.S. Trade Representative proposed another set of tariffs, including seafood products, at 10 percent in July. Then that number was upped to 25 percent in August.

In a hearing hosted by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative Aug. 20–24, Bob DeHaan of the National Fisheries Institute said the tariffs will effectively punish American fishermen for Chinese intellectual property theft, which has nothing to do with them. Of the $2.7 billion in proposed tariffs on seafood, more than $95 million came from Alaskan fishermen.

“In many cases such as the iconic Bristol Bay salmon run that just concluded this year, the fishermen are family-owned enterprises who sell their catch to seafood companies for processing, distribution and sale around the world,” he said. “How punishing these harvesters and these businesses for in effect buying American will convince China to respect its obligations regarding intellectual property rights and technology transfers is difficult to fathom.”

Read the full story at the Alaska Journal of Commerce

NFI testifies against proposed tariffs against China

August 23, 2018 — The National Fisheries Institute testified before the United States Trade Representative on 22 August in strong opposition to new tariffs proposed by the Trump Administration on Chinese goods.

The tariffs, which could be either 10 or 25 percent, would impact USD 200 billion (EUR 172 billion) in goods sourced annually from China. Robert DeHaan, representing NFI, said the tariffs would harm the seafood industry in the United States.

“USTR’s proposal will punish American fishermen and the communities that rely on them by making their products more expensive for American families to eat,” said DeHaan. “Of the [USD 2.7 billion (EUR 2.32 billion)] in annual seafood shipments subject to this proposal, an estimated [USD 950 million (EUR 819 million)] – more than a third – comes from an American fisherman – primarily an Alaska fisherman – harvesting in U.S. waters in a U.S.-flag vessel using a U.S. crew.”

The Trump Administration’s stated goal for the tariffs – making China respect its obligations regarding intellectual property rights – don’t line up with tariffs on seafood, added DeHaan.

“How punishing these harvesters – and these businesses for ‘Buying American’ – will convince China to respect its obligations regarding intellectual property rights and technology transfers is difficult to fathom,” he said. “Cutting fish is not an intellectual property secret.”

Read the full story at Seafood Source