Saving Seafood

The winds of change: Offshore wind’s role in a future Trump administration

December 30, 2024 — While offshore wind has faced the ire of Donald Trump for years, culminating with expected rollbacks of federal support in just a few weeks’ time, the industry remains surprisingly optimistic that the renewable power source will play a key role in the president-elect’s energy strategy.

Trump has repeatedly vowed to target offshore wind, blocking new projects and federal funding for the industry in his new administration. During a May campaign rally in New Jersey, the Republican promised to take action on this during his first day in office through an executive order.

Read the full article at the The Washington Examiner

Wind developers bid $93M for mid-Atlantic — blowing off Trump 2.0 threat

August 19, 2024 — The Biden administration notched a much-needed win on Wednesday in its bid to bolster the offshore wind power industry, despite the industry’s recent setbacks and the threat of former President Donald Trump’s return.

An Interior Department auction to lease federal waters for wind projects off the coasts of Delaware, Maryland and Virginia drew nearly $93 million in bids — an amount that appeared to quell nerves about the industry’s ability to withstand its political and economic headwinds.

The U.S. offshore wind industry plays a central role in President Joe Biden’s targets to cut carbon emissions from the power sector and stave off the worst effects of climate change. But the nascent industry has been plagued by rising costs, supply chain constraints, worrisome accidents and the risk that Trump, who has spent years attacking wind power, could undermine its progress.

“Despite the electoral uncertainty in the future, these are strong signals of confidence and continued interest in this market,” said Sam Salustro, senior vice president of policy for the Oceantic Network, an offshore wind industry group.

Read the full article at Politico

HAWAII: Proponents Look To Create A New Hawaii Marine Sanctuary ASAP In Case Of A Trump Return

April 14, 2024 —  A proposed national marine sanctuary is on pace to take shape in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands by early 2025, and supporters hope that timeline will make it harder to roll back the environmental protections there if former President Donald Trump retakes office next year.

Federal fisheries officials are gathering public comment at meetings across Hawaii for the proposed Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Sanctuary, which would have the same boundaries as the existing national monument that covers a vast ocean area. Unlike the monument, the sanctuary would not include the islands, only the water.

Once the public comment period ends, in early May, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration will prepare the final documents to designate the new sanctuary. NOAA expects to have those documents completed this winter, according to the agency’s timeline.

The monument is already one of the largest so-called marine protected areas on the planet, prohibiting commercial fishing, oil drilling and other impacts within a more than 582,000-square-mile area.

However, in 2017 Papahanaumokuakea was among the more than two dozen national monuments that came under review during the Trump administration to be potentially shrunk, changed or even eliminated altogether.

Ultimately, Papahanaumokuakea did not see any changes under Trump.

Read the full article at the Civil Beat

Biden administration moves to restore endangered species protections dropped by Trump

June 21, 2o23 — The Biden administration proposed bringing back rules to protect imperiled plants and animals on Wednesday as officials moved to reverse changes under former President Donald Trump that weakened the Endangered Species Act.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said it would reinstate a decades-old regulation that mandates blanket protections for species newly classified as threatened.

The blanket protections regulation was dropped in 2019 as part of a suite of changes to the application of the species law that were encouraged by industry, even as extinctions accelerate globally due to habitat loss and other pressures.

Officials also would no longer consider economic impacts when deciding if animals and plants need protection. And the rules make it easier to designate areas as critical for a species’ survival, even if it is no longer found in those locations.

That could help with the recovery of imperiled fish and freshwater mussels in the Southeast, where the aquatic animals in many cases are absent from portions of their historical range, said Fish and Wildlife Service Assistant Director Gary Frazer.

Read the full article at ABC News

Biden administration wins reprieve in fixing Endangered Species Act flaws

November 17, 2022 — The Biden administration can reevaluate changes made by the previous administration to the Endangered Species Act without at the same time fighting a trio of lawsuits by environmentalists and state and local governments that challenged the 2019 overhaul of the law.

U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar in Oakland on Wednesday granted the requests by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service to send the 2019 changes back to them for further reconsideration. The judge left the changes to the ESA intact, saying he couldn’t vacate them without having first ruled on the merits of the environmentalists’ claims.

The Center for Biological Diversity and other environmental organization sued in 2019 after the Trump administration weakened several provision of the ESA such as not automatically extending protections against killing, harassing, harming or collecting threatened species as well as endangered species.

Read the full article at Courthouse News

America’s Fishing Industry Is Getting Caught Up in the Trade War

July 20, 2022 — The American fishing industry is caught in the middle of the ongoing trade war between the U.S. and China—hooked by tariffs imposed on both sides of the Pacific.

As a result, U.S. exports of seafood have fallen to their lowest levels in a decade. That’s in large part due to the tariffs that have made the industry “less competitive and less affordable,” according to a filing by the National Fisheries Institute, an industry group, to the International Trade Commission (USITC) ahead of a hearing scheduled to take place on Thursday.

When the Trump administration imposed those tariffs in 2018, lawmakers from states with large fishing industries sounded the alarm but were ignored. “It has clearly rattled my state,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R–Alaska) said in a 2018 Senate hearing exchange with then-U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer. “​​Our seafood industry is the number one private industry in terms of the jobs and the economic opportunity it brings.”

Tariffs on seafood have hit Alaska in particular, Alaska’s fishing industry generates over $5 billion dollars in economic activity and creates nearly 70,000 jobs in the state, making it a vital lifeline for the state. Over 40 percent of U.S.-caught Alaskan salmon and one-third of all seafood from Alaska is exported to China each year. Much of it is processed in China and then re-imported to the United States for sale in grocery stores.

Read the full article at Reason

 

Meet the officials shaping Biden’s offshore energy strategy

July 14, 2022 — A climate activist, mineral economist and former Army Corps regional director are among the officials crafting President Joe Biden’s closely watched strategy for offshore energy, which could shape the direction of renewables and oil drilling for years.

Working in and around the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, they are helping steer the Biden administration’s approach to offshore oil and gas leasing and its ambitious plans to transition the nation’s oceans toward clean energy at a pivotal moment for both.

Previously focused on managing the oil industry’s access to federal stores of crude and natural gas off the nation’s coasts, BOEM is in the throes of an internal transition to meet this political moment. Its current crew of leaders reflects a unique period in the 11-year-old agency’s history and the varied nature of its growing responsibilities.

Interior and the bureau recently released a draft five-year oil program that could lead to 11 offshore oil auctions in the coming years, potentially jettisoning Biden’s lofty campaign promise to end new leasing. But the Biden administration’s proposal also suggested the possibility of going in a different direction, holding zero new lease sales between 2023 and 2028 in what would be an epic shift for the offshore oil sector.

The new bureau took over the leasing responsibility of offshore energy, while other agencies were crafted to handle the money coming from oil royalties and fees and the day-to-day safety and environmental oversight of offshore drilling.

Last month, BOEM announced that James Bennett, its long-standing chief of the office of renewable programs, has moved to a new, ambiguous role within the renewables arena at BOEM that has led to some speculation in the offshore wind industry that the Interior bureaucrat who built BOEM’s renewables approach may soon leave the agency.

Other relative newcomers to the bureau with critical roles include Marissa Knodel, an adviser in a political liaison position that’s long existed at BOEM and operates out of the public eye. She is one of the BOEM cohorts working directly with the White House to align bureau actions with Biden’s political realities.

Another less visible figure critical in BOEM’s direction is Tommy Beaudreau, the Interior deputy secretary who is second in command at the department under Interior Secretary Deb Haaland.

It was during Beaudreau’s tenure that BOEM first got serious about offshore wind and held its first offshore wind auctions in 2013. But it may be his oil and gas bona fides that matter most as the administration navigates its five-year offshore oil plan. He led BOEM in the years leading up to the last five-year plan and was involved in the consideration of shifting from regionwide oil and gas auctions in the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf-wide sales — a flip often associated with the Trump administration.

Read the full story at E&E News

Trump Said to Advance Seismic Surveys for Oil in Atlantic

November 30, 2018 — The Trump administration is taking a major step toward allowing a first-in-a-generation seismic search for oil and gas under Atlantic waters, despite protests that the geological tests involve loud air gun blasts that will harm whales, dolphins and other animals.

The National Marine Fisheries Service is set to issue “incidental harassment authorizations” allowing seismic surveys proposed by five companies that permits them to disturb marine mammals that are otherwise protected by federal law, according to three people familiar with the activity who asked not to be named before a formal announcement.

The firms, including TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Co. Asa and Schlumberger Ltd. subsidiary WesternGeco Ltd., still must win individual permits from the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management before they can conduct the work, but those are widely expected under President Donald Trump, who has made “energy dominance” a signature goal.

Read the full story at Bloomberg

 

ALASKA: Next steps to protect the industry from Pebble Mine

November 19, 2018 — Stakeholders in Alaska’s Bristol Bay have watched the federal and state regulatory landscape heave and buckle with the shifting sands of federal oversight.

Fishermen invested in other watersheds threatened by mining waste and potential mine development have watched this battle, as well. But the lessons to be learned shift at every turn. Join me and a panel of insiders on Monday at Pacific Marine Expo for a public meeting on Pebble Mine, where we will discuss next steps for the industry.

The Trump administration breathed life back into the prospects for Pebble Mine.

Pebble CEO Tom Collier wasted no time in penning a January 2017 editorial praising his company’s efforts to address the concerns of Alaska residents, the thousands of fishermen who make their living in the shadow of the potential mine and its caustic byproducts, and the millions of consumers who rely on Bristol Bay’s pristine rivers to welcome back the world’s largest wild salmon run year after year.

Read the full story at National Fisherman

Washington’s Cantwell on the coast to fight offshore oil plan

February 6, 2018 — WESTPORT, Wash. — U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) met with local fishermen, small business owners and other local leaders in Westport on Saturday to “discuss the negative impacts of the Trump Administration’s proposed offshore drilling plan on local jobs and the economy.”

Among those attending were Westport Mayor Rob Bearden, Al Carter of Ocean Gold Fish Processing, Hillary Bearden and Larry Thevik of the Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen’s Association, Mark Ballo of Brady’s Oysters, Greg Mueller of the Washington Trollers Association, Mike Cornman of Wesport Seafoods, Jonathan Sawin, representing charter boat operations, as well as local business operators Sarah McWhelan, Adrienne Jones, and Port of Grays Harbor representative Molly Bold.

“Our coastal economy, and specifically our maritime fishing economy is so important to our state,” Cantwell said in opening remarks. “That’s why we’re here, because we want to do everything we can to help it grow and to protect it.”

In a letter earlier this week, Cantwell led a bipartisan group of 16 lawmakers from the Pacific Northwest to call on Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to remove the Washington/Oregon planning area from the National Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Leasing Program for 2019-2014. Zinke in January announced the National OCS Program for 2019-2024, which proposes to make over 90 percent of the total OCS acreage and more than 98 percent of undiscovered, technically recoverable oil and gas resources in federal offshore areas available to consider for future exploration and development.

By comparison, the current program puts 94 percent of the OCS off limits. In addition, the new program proposes the largest number of lease sales in U.S. history.

Cantwell has been a leading opponent of the new policy: “Oil drilling and exploration off the Pacific Northwest coastline, or an oil spill from drilling anywhere along the Pacific Coast, poses threats to the fishing, shellfish, and tourism industries at the heart of Washington’s economy,” Cantwell said “The maritime economy in Washington contributes $50 billion dollars to the state economy and supports 191,000 jobs in the state. Other states along the Pacific coast similarly rely on their maritime industries for significant economic output.”

Cantwell told the Westport group she couldn’t understand why the current proposal was made, since oil and gas exploration off the Washington coast has “been considered before and has been rejected.”

Late Sunday, a Bureau of Ocean Energy Management public meeting and citizens forum on the proposal that had been scheduled in Tacoma at the Landmark Catering and Convention Center was abruptly cancelled by what was said to be a “credible threat.”

A news conference — that included Gov. Jay Inslee, Mayor Crystal Dingler of Ocean Shores, Gina James of the Quinault Indian Nation, state Attorney General Bob Ferguson, Commissioner of Public Lands Hillary Franz, and Thevik among the speakers — was moved to Olympia as a result.

Inslee and Dingler both cited the Nestucca oil barge collision of 1988, when 2.8 million gallons of Bunker C oil were spilled near the entrance of Grays Harbor. Inslee noted 4 million tourists visited the state’s beaches last year.

“Oil and gas drilling and the risk it poses — the inevitable risk — is unacceptable for some of the best beaches in the world,” Inslee said.

Dingler noted how the Ocean Shores Convention Center became a marine bird rescue center for oil-soaked birds after the Nestucca incident.

“Despite people’s efforts, we were able to save very few of them,” Dingler said, urging opposition to the drilling and exploration proposal “on behalf of a clean and healthy ocean, which powers our economy and is the bedrock of our way of life.”

The bureau is accepting public comments on the plan through March 9, and Cantwell has made the case for opposition in similar gatherings in Seattle and Vancouver.

“We have tried to prepare what is a response to this proposal in encouraging our various organizations in the state to communicate to the Secretary of Interior that this is a bad idea,” Cantwell said. “But unfortunately, they have continued to move forward.”

“W’re concerned about all sorts of issues,” Cantwell told the Westport group. “We’re concerned about the incidents of oil spills that we know have happened.” She also listed concerns about future earthquakes and tsunamis off the coast.

Mayor Bearden noted Westport late last month passed a resolution opposed to any coastal oil and gas drilling, similar to a resolution also adopted by the city of Ocean Shores.

“I think Westport would turn into a ghost town if we had some drilling and there was a spill,” Bearden predicted. He said mayors of several other Grays Harbor communities were considering similar resolutions.

So many local businesses depend on fishing and the marine environment, Bearden said, noting Westport is the top-producing fishing port on the West Coast and No. 10 nationally for production.

“People would not come, there would be no work” if there was an oil mishap on the coast, he said.

Carter of Ocean Gold, said his company provides about 600 jobs a year locally, with more than a dozen independent boats fishing for the enterprise.

Read the full story at the Daily World