December 10, 2015 — The following was released by the Garden State Seafood Association:
Garden State Seafood Association Executive Director Greg DiDomenico testified on Monday, December 7th in Riverhead, New York before a field hearing of the House Natural Resources Committee. In his testimony, Mr. DiDomenico outlined several major regulatory threats to the seafood industry, including: the strict interpretation of the 2006 Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA) amendments, the unfair use of the Antiquities Act and other measures to curtail commercial fishing access, and the setting of arbitrary harvest levels for commercial fishing through allocation decisions.
Mr. DiDomenico testified that the implementation of the MSA has often led to overly-precautious management that leads to too-conservative, risk-averse allocations that annually cost the commercial fishing industry millions in lost revenue. Specifically, he noted that the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council’s (MAFMC) risk policy has led to overly restrictive quotas. These precautionary measures “effectively prevent the U.S. fishing industry from achieving optimum yield,” a primary objective of the MSA.
Mr. DiDomenico praised the Committee for their hard work on the reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and pushed for reform of the MSA’s National Standard Guidelines. The GSSA supports changes to the MSA, including consideration of “relevant economic, social, or ecological factors” in management decisions, as well as additional flexibility in stock rebuilding.
Mr. DiDomenico also criticized the use of the Antiquities Act and other regulatory measures to create marine protected areas outside of the process established by MSA, stating that this top-down approach directly harms the fishing industry and denies them a voice in the process.
“The Antiquities Act provides no basis for learned discourse, no scientific, economic analysis…[its] use to create Marine National Monuments is a true top-down, dictatorial approach which is frequently championed by big-bucks environmental groups and in which the public – including the fishing community that is directly affected – has no voice,” he said.
Mr. DiDomenico advised a collaborative MSA-driven process to provide “clear, justifiable science-based conservation benefits” in the MSA framework, which provides a public process to evaluate and decide on protected areas. He recommended processes be based on the example of the Deep Sea Corals Amendment passed this year by the MAFMC, which has been widely praised as a landmark conservation measure and a model for habitat management. He urged the Committee to consider two bills which would prohibit the establishment of Marine National Monuments (H.R. 330 and H.R. 332) before certain steps are taken to obtain proper approval from affected states.
Concluding his testimony, Mr. DiDomenico brought to light troubling resource allocation issues that undermine the MSA, most importantly the “Gulf States Red Snapper Management Authority Act” (H.R. 3094) stating that the bill as proposed will harm commercial and consumer access to fish species like red snapper. Mr. DiDomenico urged the Committee to utilize substantive, common-sense reauthorization efforts to strike a balance between sustainability and profitability for the commercial fishing industry, and encouraged immediate oversight as soon as feasible.