April 1, 2013 — Federal fishing managers officially announced their plans to drastically cut the amount of fish that can be caught in New England waters.
Watch the full video from WWLP
April 1, 2013 — Federal fishing managers officially announced their plans to drastically cut the amount of fish that can be caught in New England waters.
Watch the full video from WWLP
PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — April 2, 2013 — Passamaquoddy Indians will keep fishing for lucrative glass eels in the state’s coastal rivers despite a warning from the governor that he might shut down the fishery if the tribe doesn’t follow state regulations, a tribal representative said Tuesday.
State officials say the tribe violated state law by issuing more than 500 licenses to catch the baby eels, known as elvers, which sell for up to $2,000 a pound. State law allows the tribe to issue only 200 licenses.
Gov. Paul LePage told Passamaquoddy Chief Clayton Cleaves in a heated phone call Monday that he would withdraw all support for the tribe and possibly shut down the fishery if the tribe didn’t follow state law, Tribal Council member Newell Lewey said.
The state doesn’t have authority over the tribe on fishing matters because the tribe never relinquished its fishing rights, Lewey maintained. Furthermore, the tribe considers its fishing regulations more conservation-minded than state regulations because the tribe sets a maximum allowable catch while the state puts a limit on licenses but not on how much can be harvested, he said.
Tribal members are going to keep fishing even after Marine Patrol officers and state police confronted four tribal fishermen Sunday night in eastern Maine and seized their fishing gear and after LePage delivered what tribal members considered to be a threat, Lewey said.
Read the full story from the Associated Press at the Boston Globe
April 3, 2013 — The public is invited to attend the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's April 2013 meeting
Embassy Suites Raleigh Crabtree
4700 Creedmoor Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
(919)-881-0000
For online access to the meeting, enter as a guest at: http://mafmc.adobeconnect.com/council2013/
Agenda
Tuesday, April 9
1:30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
RSA Committee
NMFS response to Council letter and next steps
3:00 p.m.
Council convenes
3:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.
Tilefish
Review, discuss, and recommend any changes to the 2014 ABC
4:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.
Standardized Bycatch Reporting Methodology (SBRM) – Doug Potts (NMFS/NERO)
Review and approve draft environmental assessment for the SBRM Omnibus Amendment for the purpose of Council and public comment
Final approval of this action is scheduled for June 2013
5:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.
Listening Session
Wednesday, April 10
9:00 a.m.
Council convenes
9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Business Session
Approval of December 2012 and February 2013 minutes
Organizational Reports
NMFS Regional Administrator
NMFS NEFSC Director
NOAA Office of General Counsel
Federal Enforcement Officials (NMFS and USCG)
ASMFC Executive Director
Liaison Report
New England Council
South Atlantic Council
Executive Director's Report – Chris Moore
Science Report – Rich Seagraves
Committee Reports
Research Set-Aside
Continuing and New Business
12:00 p.m. – 1:00 p.m.
Lunch
1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m.
Mackerel, Squid, Butterfish
Squid workshop results / summary (Fisheries Forum)
Staff Recommendations on workshop results
Control dates, roll-over provisions, GRAs, port meetings, etc.
2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.
Omnibus Recreational Amendment
Review and approval of Public Hearing Document
4:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Discussion of potential reauthorization – what's working and what's not?
Identify issues to bring forward to MONF III
Thursday, April 11
8:30 a.m.
Council convenes
8:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Forage Fish Workshop
Workshop to discuss the key issues relevant to forage fish assessment and management under the Magnuson-Stevens Act. A panel of experts will discuss the role of forage species within ecosystems and best practices with respect to their exploitation, taking their role(s) within ecosystems into account.
12:00 p.m. – 1:00 p.m.
Lunch
1:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
Forage Fish Workshop (cont'd)
The above agenda items may not be taken in the order in which they appear and are subject to change as necessary. Other items may be added, but the Council cannot take action on such items even if the item requires emergency action without additional public notice. Non-emergency matters not contained in this agenda may come before the Council and / or its Committees for discussion, but these matters may not be the subject of formal Council or Committee action during this meeting. Council and Committee actions will be restricted to the issues specifically listed in this agenda. Any issues requiring emergency action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act that arise after publication of the Federal Register Notice for this meeting may be acted upon provided that the public has been notified of the Council’s intent to take final action to address the emergency. The meeting may be closed to discuss employment or other internal administrative matters.
April 3, 2013 — The Gulf of Maine Research Institute has informed Saving Seafood that it has Trawl to Table Gloucester open for industry members.
The Gulf of Maine Research Institute invites groundfish permit holders and captains to attend a day-long event focused on building awareness of the sustainability of the groundfish resource and improving the profitability and resilience of fishing businesses.
Please join chefs, restaurant owners, and food service professionals for an informative gathering that will include:
– Interactive gear displays,
– The latest in gear research and quality handling technologies,
– Important information on accessing restaurant and food service markets, and
– Emphasis on the value of promoting underutilized species.
Restaurants sell 70% of the seafood consumed in the United States.
Chefs and restaurant owners influence what consumers want. Successful chefs are most concerned with quality of product, traceability, and sustainability. Yet, they often lack access to the latest and most accurate information on Gulf of Maine seafood and the industry that harvests it. This is your opportunity to have a conversation with chefs from your area about the importance of sourcing locally and supporting Gloucester’s fishing fleet. Space for this event is limited and will be available on a first-come, first- served basis. Please RSVP soon to reserve your spot by contacting Patty Collins at (207)228-1625 or patty@gmri.org.
When: April 10th, 2013 from 8:30am to 4:30pm
Where: Maritime Gloucester, 23 Harbor Loop, Gloucester, MA 01930
This event is hosted by the Gulf of Maine Research Institute, in partnership with Maritime Gloucester and Cape Ann Fresh Catch, with funding from the National Marine Fisheries Service.
For more information on Trawl to Table please visit www.gmri.org/trawltotable
April 3, 2013 — Citing widespread evidence of an abundance of important commercial in shore fish stocks and a scientific study that found flaws in the modeling methods used by the government to set catch limits, a contingent of state lawmakers led by Senate Minority Leader Bruce Tarr and Senate President Therese Murray are urging NOAA’s top fisheries official to allow the fleet reasonable access to stocks while new studies are conducted into the vitality of the Gulf of Maine ecosystem.
Senator Tarr and Rep. Ann-Margaret Ferrante, both of Gloucester, were among the 33 signers of a letter sent Monday and released to the Times this morning addressed to Samuel D. Rauch III, the acting administer of fisheries at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
The lawmakers emphasized to Rauch that a compelling legal case exists for the government to institute a second year of interim catch limits on Gulf of Maine cod, now in line for a 77 percent cut in landings based on a decision by Regional Administrator John Bullard and supported by a legal brief by the general counsel for NOAA that has been withheld from the public.
A delegation from Congress, the New England Fisheries Regional Council and the Gloucester-based Northeast Seafood Coalition have all argued to Bullard in writing that the Magnuson-Stevens Act allows a second year of interim measures which would reduce but not eliminate overfishing,
The council is an arm of NOAA, comprised of 17 members. The coalition is the region’s largest industry group, representing about two thirds of the commercial fishing businesses, boats and shore-side.
Behind the letter, the authors wrote, is evidence in data supplied by the NOAA Fisheries Social Science Branch, reported by the Times in recent days, as well as reports by Gloucester’s two major auction houses of a “notable concentrations” of cod on Stellwagen Bank and “plentiful yellowtail flounder” landed by boats from Gloucester’s inshore fleet.
In addition, the state lawmakers cited a report published in January by scientists at the University of Washington that “documented that the current abundance modeling methods used to establish catch limits are ineffective at maximizing sustainable harvests.
“The report indicates that reaching the abundance levels developed by current models fails to effective cause maximum sustainable yield for 82 percent of the stocks examined.”
Murray, Tarr, Ferrante and their colleagues wrote that “in the context of large and growing discrepancies between stock assessments and the abundance reflected in harvester observations and landings and the pervasive inaccuracies documented by the University of Washington, the impending irreparable damage that would be caused by planned reductions in catch limits on species such as Gulf of Maine cod is unwarranted and indefensible.”
The letter asks Rauch to suspend the impending 77 percent cut in landings of in shore cod, implement an interim action to reduce but not end overfishing of cod and haddock from inshore waters, complete an interim stock assessment to reconcile current observations with government assessments and develop new limits on landings based on the scientific observations.
Read the full story at the Gloucester Daily Times
Read the letter to NOAA
April 1, 2013 — During a visit to Eureka Tuesday, March 26 congressman Jared Huffman announced plans to introduce legislation aimed at alleviating the financial hardship of a federal loan that has been weighing on Pacific Coast groundfish fishermen for just under a decade.
Huffman’s Revitalizing the Economy of Fisheries in the Pacific Act picks up where a bipartisan bill introduced in Sept. 2012 by former North Coast congressmen Mike Thompson left off and would allow for the refinancing of a $35.7 million buyback loan authorized by Congress in 2003.
The opportunity to refinance the loan at a lower interest rate would give local groundfish fishermen the same opportunities as any homeowner or business, Huffman said during a news conference to announce the bill held outside the Humboldt Bay Aquatic Center last Tuesday afternoon. The bipartisan bill would not require the federal government to spend any new money.
”It is becoming increasingly difficult for them (fishermen) – especially small businesses – to repay that debt, plus new fees – higher fuel costs, higher health care costs – and to remain in business,” he said. “Like any of us, they would like to refinance. They would like to take advantage of these historically low interest rates that we have today, but they need an act of Congress to do that.”
A 2003 act of Congress authorized the buyback loan, which Huffman’s bill aims to change, as part of a push to address overfishing and help rebuild depleted groundfish fishery stocks along the West Coast. Under the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishing Capacity Reduction Program, funds were dispersed to fishermen who agreed to surrender fishing privileges for cash payments. In total, 91 vessels and 239 fishing permits were removed from the fishery. The remaining fishermen were tasked with the burden of repaying the buyback loan debt, with interest, at a five percent ex-vessel value – the value before processing – of all fish harvested.
However, for the first 18 months of the loan period – as interest accrued – no mechanism existed for payments to be made on the loan. By the time the first payment could be made, fishermen were facing more than $4 million in interest.
Pete Leipzig, executive director of the Eureka-based Fisherman’s Marketing Association, said while implementing the program was a good action at the time – “the people that remained in business enjoyed the benefit of having the same amount of fish, just fewer of the folks fishing for them.” He said failing to create a system to allow fishermen to make payments on the loan for so many months resulted in a financial hardship that hasn’t diminished over the years.
”We owe more money today than we borrowed because of this,” Leipzig said, “and so, moving forward with a refinance – taking advantage of the lower interest rates – is finally going to put us in a position to hopefully begin to make some headway.”
Having the ability to refinance is not only necessary to sustain local fishing communities but also helps support the local coastal economy, Huffman said.
Read the full story from the Redwood Times
April 1, 2013 — Where have the fish gone? Unsurprisingly, scientists, regulators, and fishermen all have their own hypotheses. Some claim that climate change has pushed the schools into deeper water; others say that predators like seals and dogfish have devoured the cod; still others claim that large boats have been hammering spawning aggregations and preventing the fish from breeding. Whatever the case, cod are few and far between in the once-fecund waters that lured Europeans to the New World. “There’s been an extreme contraction of the resource,” says Aaron Dority, director of the Downeast Groundfish Initiative, a project to rebuild Maine’s groundfish stocks. “You can’t find Gulf of Maine cod outside of a few select areas.”
Utter collapse wasn’t what regulators expected back in 2010, when the New England Fisheries Management Council implemented a catch shares system for the region’s groundfish industry. Catch shares are a form of fisheries management that turn public fish into private property, by splitting up a fishery’s scientifically determined “Total Allowable Catch” into exclusive slices of a pie. Each fisherman is granted a slice of the pie, and fishermen are allowed to buy, sell, or rent their slices (Read “Net Benefits,” the Journal’s earlier report on the system).
Catch shares have been credited with restoring fisheries from Alaska to New Zealand, and at their best they can be a boon to fishermen by promoting flexibility. If, say, one boat-owner is looking to scale up his operation while another has a herniated disk that’s keeping him off the water, catch shares allow the laid-up fisherman to rent or sell his share to the ambitious one. Today, 15 different US fisheries are governed by catch shares, and several more programs are in development. (While most catch share programs allot fishermen “Individual Transferable Quotas,” or ITQs, New England’s system organizes fishermen into cooperatives called sectors, which distribute shares among their members.)
Yet while catch share programs hold promise, they are not without problems. Foremost among these is determining how large a slice each fisherman should receive. Most catch share systems — New England’s included — use historical catch data to determine allocations, a method that some call “rewarding the pigs.” The fishermen most responsible for historic overfishing are grandfathered into the lion’s share of future fish. Meanwhile, younger fishermen without extensive catch histories receive comparatively tiny slices, and are forced to supplement their shares by leasing quota — often from “armchair fishermen” who keep getting paid to rent out their shares even after they’ve retired.
For those fishermen who weren’t fortunate enough to get their allotment for free, renting the right to fish can excise a huge chunk from their bottom lines. One study of British Columbia’s halibut fishery found that fishermen who were forced to lease large amounts of quota tended to be “less viable or marginally viable.” In New England, where the Total Allowable Catch was set at an extremely low level, the divide between the haves and the have-nots was especially stark. “If you’re fortunate enough to be granted sufficient initial allocation to fish, then you’re at a significant advantage relative to a fisherman who’s been granted a far lower initial allocation,” says Dority.
As these unlucky lessees quit fishing, and armchair fishermen discharge their quota to the highest bidder, access to fish often ends up concentrated in the hands of the fishermen with the most buying power. According to a NOAA review released in December 2012, that appears to be what has happened in New England’s groundfisheries since the inception of catch shares. In two years, the total number of vessels regularly catching groundfish dropped from 601 to 450, a loss of 25 percent of the fleet, and trips to sea taken by crewmen declined by 11 percent. Meanwhile, the number of boat owners with three or more vessels increased by a third, and over 85 percent of groundfish revenues piled up in the hands of just 20 percent of vessel owners. In all, there are now fewer fishermen in New England than when catch shares began, and the ones left standing are catching a larger share of the fish.
Read the full story at Earth Island Journal
April 2, 2013 –The public is invited to attend the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's April 2013 meeting
Press Contact:
Mary Clark
(302) 526-5261
Topic: Recent and Upcoming Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) Improvements
Date: April 9, 2013
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Address: Embassy Suites Raleigh Crabtree, 4700 Creedmoor Road, Raleigh, NC 27612,
Time: 5:00-6:00 p.m.
Participate Online: http://mafmc.adobeconnect.com/council2013/
The listening session will be held on April 9 in Raleigh, NC in conjunction with the Council’s April Meeting. Rob Andrews from NOAA Fisheries will give a brief overview of recent and upcoming changes to MRIP catch and effort surveys and several other aspects of the program. Following the presentation, Rob and Council leadership will take questions and comments (in person and via online chat) from the public.
Recreational data quality was one of the most frequently mentioned concerns among anglers during the Council’s 2011/2012 Visioning Project. The MRIP team at NOAA is aware of these concerns and has spent the past several years working to improve recreational data collection methods. As a result, NOAA is making several changes in the ways that recreational catch and effort are estimated.
As of March 1, 2013, a redesigned Angler Intercept Survey (also known as “dockside sampling”) has been fully implemented. The new survey is expected eliminate or reduce potential sources of bias in estimations of recreational catch.
New catch estimation methods are undergoing testing in four states. These methods were based on MRIP studies which demonstrated that mail surveys of both postal addresses and fishing licenses are effective ways to collect fishing effort data. If the current tests are successful, coast-wide implementation of the survey is expected in 2014.
Want to know more about these changes or find out how you might be affected? Got ideas for future survey improvements? Attend our next listening session and let us know!
For more information:
Visit the MAFMC Website
Visit the MRIP Implementation Plan
Sign-up for the MRIP Newsletter
Visit the MRIP Website
Read the MRIP FAQs
Visit the Project Database
Click here for Data Queries
Questions? Comments?
Contact Us:
800 N. State St., Suite 201
Dover, DE 19901
contact@mafmc.org
(302) 674-2331
April 1, 2013 — Looks like Old Man Winter has been able to accomplish what lobster fishermen haven’t been able to do for themselves over the past few seasons. He’s driven up the price of lobster.
Last week fishermen – those who fish during the winter months – were being paid a shore price of $8 a pound for their lobsters. That’s a far cry from the $3 price back in the fall.
And while lobster prices typically go up over the winter months when there is a shortage of supply, in the past couple of seasons the higher price still wasn’t what fishermen had been hoping for.
There has been a catch with the higher price, however, and it hasn’t always been in the lobster traps. Part of the reason for a more limited supply has been due to the weather over the past few months. Numerous storms and high winds in January, February and March have kept fishermen ashore more often than in past years. Although now that spring has arrived, fishermen are getting out on the water more.
“Without a doubt weather has been a major factor for the first time in four or five years,” says Marc Surette, the executive director of the Nova Scotia Fish Packers Association. “On top of that it seemed to set in earlier than usual and rarely offered many windows to get out. That limits the supply drastically when coupled with very small catches throughout the winter.”
Surette called the situation this winter a “perfect example” of how the supply/demand formula works in the fishery – fewer lobsters landed equals higher price. At this same time, this isn’t a peak time for the product.
Read the full story at the Yarmouth County Vanguard
April 2, 2013 — A month before the fishing culture of the Northeast — running from Maine to New York but based here in Gloucester and New Bedford — faces severe constraints or immobilization by extreme limits on landings, the Obama White House Monday remained mute and continued to distance himself from the federally recognized “economic disaster” wrought in large part by the president’s own administration as efforts to provide relief go nowhere fast.
Most Massachusetts Democrats in Congress tick off letters written and legislation filed to relieve the crisis.
But most have blamed House Republicans for blocking a $150 million disaster relief package that was hurriedly glued to a $60 billion Hurricane Sandy relief appropriation in the lame duck session last year.
At the same time, most Democrats refuse to acknowledge that Obama has never said a word about the need to help the fishermen who found themselves integrated — mostly against their will — into an industry re-engineered as a catch share and quota commodity market that has forced smaller independent boats to bow out of the business.
One exception has been Congressman John Tierney, whose 6th District includes Gloucester and all of Cape Ann.
“The administration has not been responsive enough to the plight of the families and businesses impacted by conditions in the fishing industry in the Northeast, and in Gloucester particularly,” Tierney said Monday in a prepared statement. “I have repeatedly pressed this matter and will continue to do so at every opportunity.
“While it is appreciated that the White House and the Department of Commerce did, at our request, issue the emergency declaration,” he added, “much more needs to be done, and we continue to seek a stronger involvement from the administration as we pursue strategies to resolve the critical issues facing our fishing community.”
For his part, Obama has continued to distance himself from the policies and their architect, the celebrated scientist Jane Lubchenco, who quietly stepped down as NOAA administrator at the end of February. The White House press office did not respond to a request for any statement issued evaluating or commemorating Lubchenco’s four years at NOAA on the president’s nomination.
Obama failed to acknowledge the disaster, propose or advocate for relief from the most extreme threat to the survival of the nation’s oldest industry.
Read the full story at the Gloucester Times
