Tierney calls for NOAA oversight field hearing in Gloucester
|
|
This statement was issued by Rep. John Tierney's office on Feb 03, 2010:
WASHINGTON, Feb 03, 2010 -- Congressman John Tierney (D-MA) called for
an oversight field hearing on the fisheries enforcement programs of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
On the heels of the Department of Commerce Inspector General report
entitled “Review of NOAA Fisheries Enforcement Programs and
Operations,” the Congressman asked Oversight and Government Reform
Domestic Policy Subcommittee Chairman Dennis Kucinich to convene an
oversight hearing on behalf of the City of Gloucester and national
fishing communities into the findings and recommendations of this
report.
“There is no better community to support a hearing on this matter than
that of Gloucester,” said Congressman John F. Tierney (D-MA). “The
fishing industry deserves action on reports pertaining to the immediate
matters impacting them – excessive penalties and unfair treatment,
among others. It only makes sense to continue to engage in oversight of
this agency so Congress and the people of Gloucester can better
understand the economic impact of these agency decisions.”
Tierney is supported in his effort to host this hearing by Congressman
Barney Frank (D-MA) and other interested colleagues. “Congressman
Tierney has taken the lead in this vital effort to help fisherman who
have been victimized by unjust enforcement policies of the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,” said Frank. “I thank him for
his leadership on this important issue, and I look forward to working
with him.”
Chairman Kucinich added, “Mr. Tierney is a valued and senior member of
the Domestic Policy Subcommittee. When he informed me of this
important issue, I immediately assured him that the Subcommittee would
hold a field hearing to investigate.”
The IG report confirmed what fishermen have been attesting to for years
– namely, that there are “systemic nationwide issues” with NOAA’s law
enforcement programs, practices and personnel. It reveals a number of
problems that warrant congressional oversight, including, as detailed
in the IG report, NOAA’s regional enforcement operations, the civil
penalty assessment process, the use of proceeds from civil penalties
(Asset Forfeiture Fund) and the reassessment of the law enforcement
workforce composition.
As the IG report rightfully states, “NOAA’s enforcement operations have
great potential to affect the fishing industry, the livelihood of
individual fishermen and the public’s confidence in NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.”
Tierney is working expeditiously to ensure these hearings are scheduled
in the near future – potentially as early as March. Furthermore, he
anticipates the Subcommittee will invite the following representatives
to participate as witnesses and testify on the impact of NOAA’s Office
of Law Enforcement practices and suggested reforms: the U.S. Commerce
Department Inspector General, NOAA's Office of Law Enforcement and
Gloucester fishing industry experts, among others.
|
|
|
|