Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow Washington arrow Sides gear up for catch share spending fight
Sides gear up for catch share spending fight
The congressional battle over NOAA's catch shares fishery management — which has raged nearly from the day the Senate confirmed Jane Lubchenco as NOAA administrator in early 2009 — has become frenzied.
 

Nineteen House members — 12 Republicans and seven Democrats, including Massachusetts Reps. John Tierney and Barney Frank — have sent a letter asking the House Appropriations Committee and the Subcommittee on Commerce and Science to amend a budget bill from the Senate with language barring the rollout of any new catch share programs in Atlantic waters in fiscal 2012, which began Oct. 1.

On the heels of the letter — drafted in the office of Republican Rep. Walter B. Jones of North Carolina and sent on Tuesday — a bipartisan coalition of six senators, including Sen. John Kerry, and two representatives, all except Kerry from the West Coast or Alaska, wrote Thursday to Lubchenco asking for NOAA to help its regional fishery management councils decide whether catch shares are appropriate in fisheries.

Meanwhile, the Environmental Defense Fund — which reported spending $275,000 on lobbyists through September this year, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, to protect EDF's investment in virtual privatization — was zeroing in on House and Senate appropriations committees that can decide to bar the Jones amendment or give it life.

The spending bill that includes the NOAA budget which came out of the Senate this week did not include any mention of catch shares, so opponents must convince the House Appropriations Committee to add language barring new programs, then hope it survives conference reconciliation.

Read the comple article by Richard Gaines in The Gloucester Times

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

MELISSA WOOD, NATIONAL FISHERMEN: Meting out the meager

May 22, 2012 - Listening to the New England Council's Groundfish Advisory Panel talk about how that industry is going to pay for monitoring costs is kind of like trying to figure out how to pay your bills when you've just lost your job. Though monitoring is important keeping costs down is critical. As Panel Member Gary Libby pointed out, "If we had 100 percent monitoring we probably wouldn't have an industry."