Ray Hilborn on Magnuson: lost yield from fishing too hard is 3%, but from fishing too little is 48%
SEAFOOD.COM NEWS [Seafoodnews.com] -- September 12, 2013 -- Ray Hilborn, Professor, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington was one of the people who testified at the House Committee on Natural Resources Magnuson hearing this week. Ray makes the point that we have lost sight of the original goals of Magnuson, which were to achieve jobs and economic benefits from sustainable resources, as well as protecting those resources from over use. Accordingly, he suggests that too rigid an approach to fishery management focusing exclusively on overfishing has distorted the outcome, so that while we lose perhaps 3% of total yield to continued overfishing, we lose as much as 48% of achievable yield by not fishing enough. He calls for a rebalancing of these goals, so that we may have both sustainable fisheries, and the economic benefits that are acheivable from our resources.
The testimony is below:
This story originally appeared on Seafood.com, a subscription site. It has been reprinted with permission.
October 21, 2014 -- Look, It’s time our federal lawmakers tackled this issue — and NOAA’s budgeted revenues — head on.
That means ensuring that a far greater share of this money — dedicated to the fishing industry, not the federal government’s grotesque management of it — is headed this way.
- ASMFC 73rd Annual Meeting Supplemental Materials Part II: American Eel Working Group Recommendations and GARFO Draft Strategic Plan
- Scientists Recommend Acceptable Biological Catches for Western Pacific Bottomfish, Hawaii Longline Catch Limits for Striped Marlin