Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home
OPINION: Obama's Cellophane Man
Over the past several years, there has been an increasingly bitter adversarial relationship between the federal government and the commercial fishing industry, particularly in New England.  The relationship has further deteriorated under Dr. Lubchenco.  Shortly after Lubchenco's confirmation, the Massachusetts Congressional Delegation requested an Inspector General investigation of the law enforcement situation.  The results were stunning and highly embarrassing for NOAA.  The IG has revealed incompetent management, corrupt disposition of funds generated by fines and property seizures from fishermen, and vindictive enforcement of regulations
 

The initial response from NOAA was to look forward, not backward.  They would rewrite procedures and policies, improve communications, and become better custodians of the people's oceans.  That is just bureaucratic double-speak for doing nothing substantive.  Nobody would be punished, not in Dr. Lubchenco's NOAA.  There would be no revisiting the improper fines and penalties identified by the IG; no fisherman would be made whole for inappropriate government aggressiveness.  Nope.  Let us put this nasty business behind us and get on with ruining the fishing industry.

Everything seemed normal until the IG's final report (previously linked) of 23 September 2010.  And then -- surprise! -- Gary Locke became personally involved and appointed a Special Master to look into the IG's findings and determine "whether to take action to modify or remit the penalties."  This was a direct contradiction of Dr. Lubchenco's approach and a major victory for the industry.

Read the complete opinion piece from American Thinker.

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

MELISSA WOOD, NATIONAL FISHERMEN: Meting out the meager

May 22, 2012 - Listening to the New England Council's Groundfish Advisory Panel talk about how that industry is going to pay for monitoring costs is kind of like trying to figure out how to pay your bills when you've just lost your job. Though monitoring is important keeping costs down is critical. As Panel Member Gary Libby pointed out, "If we had 100 percent monitoring we probably wouldn't have an industry."