Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow Washington arrow Battle against fishing overregulation nets some national support
Battle against fishing overregulation nets some national support
On Thursday, a group of six U.S. senators and two congressmen, headed by Sen. Barbara Boxer of California, wrote to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Administrator Jane Lubchenco seeking more focus on the needs of communities affected by catch shares and expressing concern about their "potential disproportionate impacts on smaller fishing communities."
 

John Kerry was the only signatory from the East Coast, with the others representing California, Oregon and Alaska.

In a prepared response to The Standard-Times, Eric Schwaab, NOAA assistant administrator for fisheries, said: "We welcome the letter from Congress as an opportunity to highlight what we have been doing and our thoughts on these issues as we move forward. NOAA has been actively engaged in a variety of catch share-related activities to assist communities and fishery management councils. We'll be providing the members of Congress with a more detailed response on what NOAA is and will do to assist fishery management councils with their work considering catch shares and other management tools that help support stable jobs and sustainable fisheries."

New England fishermen have received most of the attention since catch shares were introduced to the ground fishery in May 2010. But concerns about the system are spreading to other regions of the country.

A letter signed by 19 congressmen, sent earlier in the week to the House Appropriations Committee, seeks to restrict funding for new catch share programs for all fisheries under the jurisdiction of the New England, Mid-Atlantic or South Atlantic Fishery Management councils.

Read the complete stroy from The South Coast Today

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

MELISSA WOOD, NATIONAL FISHERMEN: Meting out the meager

May 22, 2012 - Listening to the New England Council's Groundfish Advisory Panel talk about how that industry is going to pay for monitoring costs is kind of like trying to figure out how to pay your bills when you've just lost your job. Though monitoring is important keeping costs down is critical. As Panel Member Gary Libby pointed out, "If we had 100 percent monitoring we probably wouldn't have an industry."