Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home
State backs ports' fishing suit
NEW BEDFORD - January 14, 2011 - The state Thursday jumped in on the side of New Bedford and Gloucester in their federal lawsuit against the Commerce secretary over fishing allocations.
 

On behalf of Gov. Deval Patrick, Attorney General Martha Coakley filed an amicus brief backing the lawsuit's contention that Amendment 16 to the Magnuson-Stevens Act violated the law in at least four ways.

The state is asking Federal District Court Judge Rya Zobel to send the issue of annual catch limits back to Commerce Secretary Gary Locke for upward recalculation. The brief argues the annual catch limits now do not reflect the "optimal yield" that the law demands for the fishing industry but rather sets the limits artificially and damagingly low.

The two fishing ports, filing suit last summer, asked for a wider array of remedies, including declaring that Amendment 16 is illegal, that Commerce reimburse the cities' legal expenses, that Amendment 16 be suspended, that Commerce undertake a thorough economic analysis of various alternatives and not just one plan, and anything else the court may deem appropriate.

Coakley told The Standard-Times that the narrower appeal is the result of limitations on the state's participation as a friend of the court and not a party in the case.

Read the complete story from The Standard-Times.

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

MELISSA WOOD, NATIONAL FISHERMEN: Meting out the meager

May 22, 2012 - Listening to the New England Council's Groundfish Advisory Panel talk about how that industry is going to pay for monitoring costs is kind of like trying to figure out how to pay your bills when you've just lost your job. Though monitoring is important keeping costs down is critical. As Panel Member Gary Libby pointed out, "If we had 100 percent monitoring we probably wouldn't have an industry."