Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow State and Local arrow Gov. Patrick takes fish fight directly to President Obama's desk
Gov. Patrick takes fish fight directly to President Obama's desk
Gov. Deval Patrick today appealed directly to a personal friend, President Obama, to intervene with the federal Commerce Department to provide administration for regulatory and economic relief for fishermen from government-created hardships.
 

Patrick's letter, dated Friday, marked the first reach to the president himself since Patrick and Massachusetts' congressional delegation last year began negotiations and lobbying efforts to recognize and respond to the economic hardships, including a "poorly planned transition to the 'catch shares' system," that the new regulatory regimen has wrought.

"That the governor is redoubling his effort on behalf of our fishing communities gives us a glimmer of hope that something might change yet," said Mayor Carolybn Kirk. "The circumstances require intervention by President Obama, and I applaud Governor Patrick for making good on the promise he made to Gloucester fishermen when he visited us this past fall." 

In his appeal, Patrick noted that the industry based in Gloucester and New Bedford employs 80,000 people in fisheries and shoreside businesses and generates $4.4 billion into the economy.

Patrick and the ports were rebuffed by Commerce Secretary Gary Locke earlier this month. The secretary swept aside as insufficient an economic and regulatory analysis of the impact of the catch share system linked to fishing cooperatives that found direct losses of approximately $20 million due to super-conservative allocations into the commodities market created for the groundfishery by the New England Fishery Management Council.

Read the complete story from The Gloucester Times.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

MELISSA WOOD, NATIONAL FISHERMEN: Meting out the meager

May 22, 2012 - Listening to the New England Council's Groundfish Advisory Panel talk about how that industry is going to pay for monitoring costs is kind of like trying to figure out how to pay your bills when you've just lost your job. Though monitoring is important keeping costs down is critical. As Panel Member Gary Libby pointed out, "If we had 100 percent monitoring we probably wouldn't have an industry."