|
Emily Keiley of the University of Massachusetts School for Marine
Science and Technology has produced a summary of the Northeast Fisheries
Summit that was held on March 8, 2010.
The Northeast Fisheries Summit was held at the New Bedford Whaling
Museum in New Bedford, Massachusetts on Monday, March 8, 2010. The
meeting was co-sponsored by the City of New Bedford, University of
Massachusetts Dartmouth, and the Massachusetts Marine Fisheries
Institute. The Summit was intended to restore a foundation of trust
between NOAA and the fishing community through dialogue focused on the
shared objectives of sustainable fish stocks and the economic viability
of fishing communities. The principles of equity, fairness,
conservation, preservation of jobs and income, minimization of waste,
and flexibility in management can only be realized through a
collaborative approach to management. The Summit was held to begin
building a more collaborative and constructive relationship between
government, industry, and political interests.
The Summit was structured as follows. At 9:00 a.m. the Mayor of New
Bedford, Scott Lang, opened the meeting welcoming all of the
participants and thanking the co-sponsors and venue. Several elected and
appointed officials also addressed the group. After introductions,
three panel discussions were held. The meeting concluded at 5:30 p.m.
John Bullard moderated the meeting. Dr. Brian Rothschild, Montgomery
Charter Professor of Marine Science at the University of Massachusetts
Dartmouth School for Marine Science and Technology, chaired the meeting.
Three issues were selected for discussion: (1) catch shares and sectors,
(2) scallops and scallop by-catch, and (3) amending the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA). Panels
of five to seven people were chosen to discuss each topic. Panels were
populated with representatives from government agencies, environmental
groups, academic institutions, and fishery stakeholders. Each panel
member was given ten minutes to speak on the designated topic. After
each panel completed, audience members were given the opportunity to
speak. Panel members and audience participants were encouraged to
discuss the issues, along with potential solutions.
While a wide variety of views were expressed, the Summit resulted in the
following consensuses:
(1) It appears that sectors, in general, will not be economically
viable. To make the sectors feasible additional quota would need to be
allocated.
(2) One technique would be to place a moratorium, or freeze, on the
implementation of sector-based management (Amendment 16 to the Northeast
Multispecies Fishery Management Plan);
(3) Increase flexibility of the MSA, specifically regarding rebuilding
periods;
(4) Clarification of the definition of / distinction between catch
shares, Limited Access
Privilege Programs (LAPPs), and sectors;
(5) Increased support for cooperative research programs; and
(6) Development of a buyback program to precede the implementation of
sector-based management. This report summarizes the findings and
discussions of the Summit.
Read the Report of the Northeast Fisheries Summit [pdf]
|