Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow Columns arrow GLOUCESTER TIMES: State of the Union theme hypocritical on NOAA policies
GLOUCESTER TIMES: State of the Union theme hypocritical on NOAA policies
It especially strikes a chord with those who work in or around the fishing industry, here in Gloucester, across New England and around America's three coasts. And they would have a couple of pretty basic questions:
 

"We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by. Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules."

Those words by President Obama during his State of the Union address Tuesday night understandably touched the nerves of a lot of Americans struggling amid today's continuing economic clouds.

It especially strikes a chord with those who work in or around the fishing industry, here in Gloucester, across New England and around America's three coasts. And they would have a couple of pretty basic questions:

-If that's what the president believes, why, in the case of America's fisheries, is his administration pushing — not pursuing, pushing — a catch shares management policy that steers more and more of fishermen's quota and more of the revenue into the hands of few larger corporate hands, as documented by NOAA's own statistics for the 2010-2011 fishing year?

-How can he allow his own appointee — National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration chief Jane Lubchenco — to continue to snub calls from congressional lawmakers to end her job-killing policies that, by her own stated goal, are aimed at consolidating the fleet while creating what Gov. Deval Patrick and others have long recognized as an "economic disaster" for Gloucester and other fishing communities?

-Does the president not know or see what Lubchenco and allies — nonprofit giants such as the Environmental Defense Fund, which has given us catch shares and its land-based cousin, the cap-and-trade program — have done? Does he not care that, while he's campaigning on a pledge of jobs and social change, this wayward wing of his own government is actively putting more and more in the fishing industry out of work?

Read the complete editorial in The Gloucester Times

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

HASTINGS: Time to improve the Endangered Species Act

May 18, 2012 - When the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was signed into law in 1973 by President Nixon, he spoke about the importance of preserving “the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed.” I believe that goal is as important today as it was back then. However, after nearly 40 years, it’s time to take a fresh, honest look at the law and consider whether there are ways it could be improved to do a better job of protecting and recovering species.