Wading into fish oil supplement safety
|
|
Just when it seemed that trying to eat well was confusing enough - sugar
or substitute, raw milk or fortified, red wine or no - the safety of a
heart-health stalwart is under attack. Fish oil supplements, which
provide beneficial omega-3 fatty acids and are among the nation's most
popular well-being boosters, have a dark side, says a lawsuit filed in
San Francisco Superior Court by the Mateel Environmental Justice
Foundation of Eureka.
Ten over-the-counter fish oil supplements - of the at least 200
brands estimated to be on the market - were tested by Mateel and found
to contain toxins called polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs. The levels,
not disclosed on labels, varied widely; some were far above what
requires a warning label under California's Proposition 65 disclosure
rules, which mandate that manufacturers list certain toxins in their
products. Among those toxins are PCBs because of their carcinogenic
risks as well as their link to reproductive problems. California has set
an acceptable risk level for PCBs as carcinogens: a scant 90 billionths
of a gram a day (90 nanograms). No acceptable risk level has been set
for reproductive effects.
The tests, conducted on manufacturers' recommendations for daily
dosages, which vary widely, found that three of the 10 products
contained PCB levels above that benchmark for carcinogens. David Roe, an
attorney for the environmental plaintiffs, says Mateel tested daily
dosages because the results would yield a true measure of daily intake
because most consumers follow label recommendations. The lowest level,
found in Solgar's Norwegian Cod Liver Oil, was 70 times below the
highest, found in Now Foods Salmon Oil. Different dosages could account
for some of the variance among the products, but the tests found that
concentration levels of PCBs varied as well.
Read the complete story at The San Francisco Chronicle.
|
|
|
|