Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow Nutrition arrow State may test fish DNA to prevent mislabeling
State may test fish DNA to prevent mislabeling
State officials are considering using DNA testing to combat fish mislabeling and are launching a pilot program in partnership with Legal Sea Foods that would trace seafood using barcodes, according to testimony prepared today for a hearing on fish mislabeling held by the state Legislature’s Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure.
 

The Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, the state Department of Public Health, and the Department of Fish and Games’ Division of Marine Fisheries, and are “in the process of facilitating discussions around the issue of fish genetics testing with faculty and staff at UMass Dartmouth’s School of Marine Science and Technology (SMSAT),” Charles Carroll, director of the state’s Division of Standards at the Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, wrote in prepared testimony.

"We are confident that the Administration’s coordinated response, focusing on both education and enforcement, including examining the possibility of integrating fish genetics testing, will ensure that that the fish retail marketplace in Massachusetts adequately protects both businesses and consumers alike.”

These efforts follow a Globe report in October that uncovered widespread seafood misrepresentation at area restaurants and lax government oversight. The five-month investigation revealed that Massachusetts consumers routinely and unwittingly overpay for less valued fish or purchase seafood that is different from what is advertised.

Read the complete story from The Boston Globe

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

HASTINGS: Time to improve the Endangered Species Act

May 18, 2012 - When the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was signed into law in 1973 by President Nixon, he spoke about the importance of preserving “the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed.” I believe that goal is as important today as it was back then. However, after nearly 40 years, it’s time to take a fresh, honest look at the law and consider whether there are ways it could be improved to do a better job of protecting and recovering species.