Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow Nutrition arrow Markey opens inquiry into mislabeling of fish
Markey opens inquiry into mislabeling of fish
US Representative Edward Markey opened a congressional investigation yesterday into fish labeling following the results of a Globe report published this week that uncovered extensive seafood misrepresentation at area restaurants and scant government oversight.
 

Markey, the top Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee, which has jurisdiction over fishing and ocean issues, is also considering legislation to combat consumer fraud and ensure better inspection and labeling of fish products.

“It’s hard not to conclude that something fishy has been going on when it comes to fish labeling,’’ Markey said. “This kind of fish fraud isn’t just an affront to consumers’ wallets, it also could be a danger to the health of our people and the health of New England’s seafood economy. We cannot allow shady practices by middlemen or restaurants to taint the excellent reputation of the New England fishing industry.’’

The five-month Globe investigation found that Massachusetts consumers regularly and unwittingly overpay for less valued fish or buy seafood that is not what it is advertised to be. The newspaper hired a lab in Canada to conduct DNA tests on fish that reporters purchased across the region. The results showed that 48 percent, or 87 of the 183 seafood samples, were sold with the wrong species name. Such misnaming can put consumers at risk of suffering allergic reactions, violating dietary restrictions, or ingesting chemicals banned in the United States.

Markey yesterday sent letters to top officials at the US Food and Drug Administration, which is charged with overseeing labeling, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which monitors fisheries. He requested information from both agencies, including the percentage of domestic and imported fish that are inspected, the level of coordination between federal agencies to detect mislabeling, and what additional resources are needed to increase seafood inspections for species substitution.

Read the complete article from The Boston Globe

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

HASTINGS: Time to improve the Endangered Species Act

May 18, 2012 - When the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was signed into law in 1973 by President Nixon, he spoke about the importance of preserving “the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed.” I believe that goal is as important today as it was back then. However, after nearly 40 years, it’s time to take a fresh, honest look at the law and consider whether there are ways it could be improved to do a better job of protecting and recovering species.