Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow Management & Regulation arrow OUR VIEW: Hurting the scallopers
OUR VIEW: Hurting the scallopers
The council's intentions are good, but it should reconsider the unnecessary burden over-regulation would place on a healthy and important fishery.
 

The council chose a conservative method of calculating the allowable scallop harvest by dialing-down the numbers to allow for a significant amount of scientific uncertainty about the number of scallops out there.

Since scallops lie on the sea floor and have been studied extensively by UMass Dartmouth and others (with partial funding from the industry), their population dynamics are some of the best-understood in the country. It's hard to imagine a fishery with less scientific uncertainty.

Scallopers are not going out of business, at least not now. But that should not be the standard for promulgating new regulations. Science should be the standard, and it looks like this time, science may be on the side of the scallopers.

Dr. Kevin Stokesbury, a scallop researcher at UMass Dartmouth's School for Marine Science and Technology, told The Standard-Times the council "went too far," and we agree.

Read the complete story at The South Coast Today.

Bookmark and Share Print
 

HASTINGS: Time to improve the Endangered Species Act

May 18, 2012 - When the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was signed into law in 1973 by President Nixon, he spoke about the importance of preserving “the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed.” I believe that goal is as important today as it was back then. However, after nearly 40 years, it’s time to take a fresh, honest look at the law and consider whether there are ways it could be improved to do a better job of protecting and recovering species.