|
August 13, 2012 -- Captain Larry Yacubian, a former New Bedford,
Massachusetts fishermen who lost his business, his boat, his license to
fish - and literally the family farm - as a result of a Federal
prosecution described by the United States Secretary of Commerce
as having "overstepped the bounds of propriety and fairness..." is
seeking to hold the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) accountable for its actions in a recently filed lawsuit
in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. "By
forcing them to face the consequences of their actions, I hope to deter
the agency from continuing its egregious conduct and to remedy the harm
NOAA has done to my family and me," said Captain Yacubian.
For background on NOAA's mistreatment of Capt. Yacubian, see this video from 'Dan Rather Reports'
For background on the NOAA enforcement scandal, see this video from CBS Evening News with Katie Couric
The public filing of the lawsuit follows the denial of Captain
Yacubian's administrative claim. The Department of Commerce took the
full sixth months allowed to consider the claim (after six months the
claim was automatically deemed denied).
Members of Congress React
"Larry Yacubian lost his home and business because NOAA abused their power and was more motivated by money than justice," said Senator Scott Brown
(R-Mass.). "Rather than come clean about the enforcement managers and
attorneys who broke the public trust, NOAA has kept important documents
secret. I have and will continue to push for answers. NOAA's outrageous
conduct in this case continues today with Dr. Lubchenco's refusal to
release all relevant information about NOAA's actions against Mr.
Yacubian."
"It is an embarrassment to the U.S. government that Larry Yacubian has
to return to the legal system to receive fair compensation," said Congressman Barney Frank
(D-Mass.). "His case was cited by the Department of Commerce's
Inspector General and Judge Swartwood as the quintessential example of
mistreatment by NOAA Law Enforcement. While the government apologized
and returned the fines to fishermen that were harmed that figure fell
well short of covering their legal fees and lost earnings. The
government admitted it did Mr. Yacubian and others harm, now it should
provide restitution."
"Mr. Yacubian's case underscores the detrimental effects that
mistreatment by NOAA's Office of Law Enforcement has had on our local
fishermen. It is ridiculous that Mr. Yacubian is still being forced to
fight for fair compensation, and he is right to pursue all possible
measures for recourse," Congressman John Tierney (D-Mass.) said.
"The first step toward righting the unjust penalties and fines incurred
by Massachusetts fishermen at the hands of poor leadership by the
Commerce Department was the remittance of those penalties to some of the
businesses and fishermen, like Captain Yacubian, who were treated
unlawfully," said Congressman Bill Keating (D-Mass.). "It is unacceptable that, over one year later, many of these same individuals are still fighting for restitution."
Wrongdoing at NOAA
The lawsuit comes on the heels of the first investigation and report of Special Master Charles B. Swartwood, III,
which found "overzealous, abusive or arbitrary conduct by NOAA
personnel which unfairly impacted the outcome of several of the reviewed
cases," including Captain Yacubian's. The conduct stemmed from "a lack
of supervision, oversight, and standards in the work of NOAA law
enforcement."
An investigation of NOAA uncovered not only abuses in the prosecutorial
process, but also in the use of fines paid by fishermen into NOAA's
Asset Forfeiture Fund. The Commerce Department Inspector General
found that these funds were used to purchase "luxurious" undercover
vessels, buy 202 vehicles for a staff of 172, and take trips around the
world. After a June 2011 Senate hearing, Senator Scott Brown observed that "These enforcement officials went on a spending spree funded by the hardworking fishermen."
A second report by Special Master Swartwood "may contain crucial
additional information about victims of abuse and injustice at the hands
of NOAA Law Enforcement personnel," according to a letter sent to NOAA
by Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.). The second Swartwood Report was
submitted to Commerce Secretary John Bryson in April 2012. Both Senator
Kerry and Senator Brown have written to NOAA, repeatedly asking when
this second report will be released. NOAA has not responded.
Facts of Captain Yacubian's Case
(for additional detail please see the complaint filed in Federal court)
On June 14, 2000, NOAA Enforcement Attorney Charles Juliand issued a
Notice of Violation and Assessment (NOVA) and a Notice of Permit
Sanction (NOPS). The NOVA accused Captain Yacubian of fishing in a
restricted area and making a false statement. Special Master Swartwood
found that there is "credible evidence that money was NOAA's motivating
objective" for prosecuting Captain Yacubian.
In response, Captain Yacubian requested a hearing before an
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and began to marshal evidence in his
defense. A key issue in the case was the reliability of plotting data
from a system known as Boatracs, which was used to track Captain
Yacubian in the restricted area. Seeking to prove that the system was
unreliable, Captain Yacubian's counsel asked Massachusetts Environmental
Police Officer, Captain Peter Hanlon, to take pictures of two vessels,
the Theresa R II (which had no engine) and the Kathy Marie, both of
which were secured to the north end of the State Pier in New Bedford,
Massachusetts, but were plotted by Boatracs at a point that was 1.5
miles from their actual location.
But Officer Hanlon never testified in Captain Yacubian's case because,
according to the Swartwood Report, the Special Agent in Charge at NOAA
"put enough pressure on Captain Hanlon to request that he be excused
from testifying." Had Captain Hanlon testified, his "testimony and
documentation could have challenged [the reliability of the Boatracs
systems.]" Without this testimony, Captain Yacubian lost his case before
the ALJ.
A series of appeals culminated for Captain Yacubian in the United States
District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Boston. There,
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton vacated the ALJ's finding of a false statement
by Captain Yacubian due to a lack of evidence and vacated all penalties
assessed as excessive. The case was remanded to NOAA, where a new ALJ,
Parlen McKenna, reinstated the false statements charge, "completely
ignor[ing] the District Court Judgment," according to Special Master
Swartwood. ALJ McKenna, one month later, attended a workshop in Kuala
Lumpur with the NOAA prosecuting attorneys, Charles Juliand and Mitch
MacDonald. According to Special Master Swartwood, this "presented an
actual conflict of interest," or, at the least, "created the appearance
of a conflict."
In order to pay his mounting legal fees, Captain Yacubian attempted to
sell his boat. But NOAA Enforcement Attorney Charles Juliand repeatedly
blocked the sale. Ultimately, Captain Yacubian's wife was instead forced
to sell her family farm in Westport, Massachusetts - a farm that had
been in her family for generations. But even this was not enough.
Captain Yacubian could not have his case heard in Federal court again
until he repeated the same legal battles before NOAA, incurring the same
legal fees.
As Special Master Swartwood explained, with Captain Yacubian out of
resources, the agency "coerced a settlement with Lawrence M. Yacubian by
refusing to adhere to Judge Gorton's order and by seeking and relying
on a questionable ruling by ALJ McKenna." The settlement was
oppressive, securing a civil penalty far greater than that initially
assessed and revoking Captain Yacubian's operator permit, preventing him
from returning to his career as a fisherman.
Legal Representation
The law firms of Burns & Levinson, LLP in Boston, and Hunton &
Williams, LLP in Washington, DC are representing Captain Yacubian in
this case.
Captain Yacubian is available to members of the press for brief interviews.
As the subject of discussion is a pending lawsuit, the scope of the
interview must be limited to his reactions to the filing of the lawsuit.
Contact:
Robert B. Vanasse
202-333-2628
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Related Documents
Secretary of Commerce's Decision Memorandum following the Swartwood Report
Yacubian's Federal court complaint
The first Swartwood Report
The Inspector General's Report showing misuse of Asset Forfeiture Funds
AP coverage of June 2011 Senate Federal Financial Management Subcommittee hearing
Letter from Senator John Kerry to NOAA inquiring about second Swartwood report
Letter from Sen. Scott Brown to Sec. of Commerce Bryson inquiring about second Swartwood report
Letter from Senator Scott Brown to Acting Secretary of Commerce Blank inquiring about second Swartwood report
|