Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home
US commerce boss: No expansion of fishery enforcement review
BOSTON (AP) -- Jan. 27, 2011 -- The federal commerce secretary has denied a request by Northeast lawmakers who lobbied him to allow more fishermen accused of breaking the law to have their cases reviewed for fairness.

Secretary Gary Locke also refused to freeze pending sanctions against fishermen while a special investigator he appointed considers whether several questionable penalties imposed by fishery police are justified, according to a memo dated Tuesday.
 

Locke last year appointed retired judge Charles Swartwood to look into the cases, following a review by his department's inspector general of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's law enforcement office.

The review found financial mismanagement, abusive treatment of fishermen and the use of high-pressure tactics to force them to settle claims. It also highlighted 19 questionable penalties for more scrutiny.

Massachusetts congressmen and Gov. Deval Patrick asked Locke to create a "window of time" for other fishermen to come forward, arguing they may have previously been too intimidated to file a complaint within a system they considered biased.

Lawmakers were already miffed at Locke for his denial earlier this month of a request by Patrick for emergency increases in fish catch limits. On Thursday, U.S. Rep. Barney Frank called Locke's decision "one more assault on the legitimate concerns of the fishing industry," and said Locke was denying fishermen "a chance at justice."

He promised to bring up the decision with the White House.

Read the complete AP story by Jay Lindsay in The Washington Post.

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

HASTINGS: Time to improve the Endangered Species Act

May 18, 2012 - When the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was signed into law in 1973 by President Nixon, he spoke about the importance of preserving “the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed.” I believe that goal is as important today as it was back then. However, after nearly 40 years, it’s time to take a fresh, honest look at the law and consider whether there are ways it could be improved to do a better job of protecting and recovering species.