Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow Law arrow NEW JERSEY: Judge hears catch quota arguments
NEW JERSEY: Judge hears catch quota arguments
POINT PLEASANT BEACH, NJ - Some mid-Atlantic fishermen challenging a controversial system of catch quotas say that two-thirds of the fishing industry must vote in its favor before it can be imposed. Their contention was raised during arguments in a federal court hearing in Boston. The New England case has been at the center of a legal and political battle over the catch quota system involving cod, haddock and flounder.
 

When a federal judge, Rya Zobel, heard the arguments Tuesday, attention focused on one allegation raised by mid-Atlantic fishermen. They argue federal law says the catch quotas cannot be imposed without an industrywide referendum that wins support among two-thirds of the affected fishing boat owners, captains and crews.

"The arguments quickly zeroed in on the issue of catch shares being an ITQ (individual transferable quotas system) and needing a referendum," said James Lovgren of the Fishermen's Dock Cooperative in Point Pleasant Beach.

Lovgren is one of the captains supporting a challenge to the catch share system, which is being defended by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Read the complete story from the Asbury Park Press.

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

HASTINGS: Time to improve the Endangered Species Act

May 18, 2012 - When the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was signed into law in 1973 by President Nixon, he spoke about the importance of preserving “the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed.” I believe that goal is as important today as it was back then. However, after nearly 40 years, it’s time to take a fresh, honest look at the law and consider whether there are ways it could be improved to do a better job of protecting and recovering species.