Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow Law arrow Mayors, cities filed to appael fisheries ruling
Mayors, cities filed to appael fisheries ruling
Gloucester Mayor Carolyn Kirk and New Bedford Mayor Scott Lang have filed notice of their intent to appeal U.S. District Court Judge Rya Zobel's June 30 ruling rejecting challenges to the Department of Commerce's "Amendment 16" fisheries regulatory framework and its controversial "catch shares" management system imposed for New England in May 2010.
 

The mayor and their cities are among 30 plaintiffs from the fishing community who are challenging Amendment 16, claiming the implementation of the current system violated the Magnuson-Stevens Act.

On appeal, the plaintiffs will continue to argue that, in drafting and implementing Amendment 16, NOAA improperly created a system that was — in all but name — a Limited Access Privilege permit system, but that ignored the Magnuson-Stevens Act's requirement of a referendum before the enactment of a quota system, according to SavingSeafood.Com, a leading online fisheries news service.

"We all know the saying 'a rose by any other name would smell as sweet' from Shakespeare. That's what NOAA and the Council did," said Kirk. "They built a system that would have triggered a referendum if they had called it what it is. But the Council knew they couldn't win a referendum. So they renamed it.

"Then the crafty NOAA lawyers wrote an interpretation of the law that tiptoed around the clear meaning of the Amendment Congressman Frank inserted requiring a referendum," she added. "That's how we ended up with this system, but this system does not smell like roses."

 

Read the complete story from The Gloucester Times

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

HASTINGS: Time to improve the Endangered Species Act

May 18, 2012 - When the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was signed into law in 1973 by President Nixon, he spoke about the importance of preserving “the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed.” I believe that goal is as important today as it was back then. However, after nearly 40 years, it’s time to take a fresh, honest look at the law and consider whether there are ways it could be improved to do a better job of protecting and recovering species.