Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow Law arrow Fishermen divided over whether to appeal catch shares ruling
Fishermen divided over whether to appeal catch shares ruling
NEW BEDFORD — Sharp differences have emerged among commercial fishermen over the wisdom of appealing the verdict in a federal lawsuit that went against the industry.

At Mayor Scott Lang's Oceans and Fisheries Council meeting at the whaling museum this week, fishermen publicly aired their views for the first time, sometimes rancorously, with the mayor adamant that the appeal must proceed.
 

"Catch shares are going to collapse the industry unless it's straightened out," Lang said. "That's the whole point of the suit. If we let them off the hook, two years from now you'll be knocking on my door on Orchard Street saying: 'Can we come in. We've got some major problems with NOAA.'"

In July, federal court Judge Rya Zobel ruled in favor of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration in a dispute over the legality of the controversial catch shares system governing groundfishing in the Northeast. The plaintiffs included the cities of New Bedford and Gloucester, along with eight entities and individuals representing fishing interests.

However, a pending appeal has prompted fears that overturning the verdict could throw the industry into chaos by scrapping the regulations.

A letter, with the names of 105 fishermen and boat owners attached, was sent to all New England senators and congressmen on Nov. 14 warning them of "dangerous proposals that truly put the future of our businesses and fisheries at risk." Maggie Raymond, co-owner of two fishing boats and executive director of the Associated Fisheries of Maine, whose members also signed the letter, advised the mayor to pursue change through Congress, rather than the courts.

Read the complete story from The Standard-Times

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

HASTINGS: Time to improve the Endangered Species Act

May 18, 2012 - When the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was signed into law in 1973 by President Nixon, he spoke about the importance of preserving “the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed.” I believe that goal is as important today as it was back then. However, after nearly 40 years, it’s time to take a fresh, honest look at the law and consider whether there are ways it could be improved to do a better job of protecting and recovering species.