|
Cities to appeal court ruling on fisheries |
|
NEW BEDFORD — The cities of New Bedford and Gloucester have announced they will appeal the verdict in a federal lawsuit that challenged the legality of the controversial catch share system now governing the New England groundfish industry.
In a major setback for the fishing ports, United States District Court Judge Rya Zobel's decision, handed down on June 30, ruled in favor of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and against the industry. Arguments were heard in federal court in March with the outcome resting on the interpretation of the Magnuson-Stevens Act that governs federal fishing policy. Among other things, the lawsuit claimed that Amendment 16 to Magnuson, which enacted catch shares, would privatize the fishery and consolidate it in the hands of big players. Many New Bedford groundfish vessels with insufficient fishing quota have been left idle since the new system was adopted in May of last year. The suit was filed by both cites in conjunction with other plaintiffs from the fishing industry in Massachusetts and beyond. In the aftermath of the suit's dismissal, plaintiffs Lovegren et al, a group of groundfishermen from New York and New Jersey, filed what is known as a motion for reconsideration, essentially a request to the same judge to reconsider the verdict. That motion was denied by Judge Zobel on Wednesday just as New Bedford Mayor Scott Lang and Gloucester Mayor Carolyn Kirk filed notice of their intent to appeal. This filing is a required preliminary step, after which there is a 60-day window in which to submit the appeal.
Read the complete story from The South Coast Today
|
|||
|
|
|
||
HASTINGS: Time to improve the Endangered Species Act
May 18, 2012 - When the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was signed into law in 1973 by President Nixon, he spoke about the importance of preserving “the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed.” I believe that goal is as important today as it was back then. However, after nearly 40 years, it’s time to take a fresh, honest look at the law and consider whether there are ways it could be improved to do a better job of protecting and recovering species.






News 