Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow International & Trade arrow Scientist: Tuna's swim backs east-west mix
Scientist: Tuna's swim backs east-west mix
Gloucester, Mass. -- August New Jersey charter boat Capt. Mike Formichella, fishing about 30 miles offshore earlier this month, landed, tagged and released a baby bluefin tuna that had made the trans-Atlantic trip from the Bay of Biscay between France and Spain, a distance of roughly 2,000 miles, the Asbury Park Press reported.

The growing body of evidence that the giant bluefins cross the ocean frequently and mix is important, Lutcavage explained, because the International Commission for the Conservation of Tunas — or ICCAT — assumes two separate stocks, eastern and western, for the purposes of regulatory conservation. The border line is 45 degrees west longitude, running from the southern tip of Greenland to a bit east of the mouth of the Amazon River in Brazil. Conservation efforts are better in the Western Atlantic, it is commonly accepted.

”U.S. boats fish within their quotas, but in the Mediterranean they are not doing as well,” she said.

While adherence to quotas are the norm in the Western Atlantic, the Mediterranean is another matter. For example, until his ouster last October, the family of the late Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi was heavily involved with bluefin tuna ranching and undoubtedly paid no heed to ICCAT quotas, according to Lutcavage and a number of journalists.
 

Most complaints about irresponsible human harvesting of bluefin focus in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean. In November 2010, when ICCAT met in Paris a team of reporters from the International Consortium of Investigative Journalist released a study that found “widespread illegalities rippling throughout the supply chain of the Mediterranean and East Atlantic bluefin tuna fishery and trade,” according to Sergi Tudela, of the World Wildlife Foundation Mediterranean.

Atlantic bluefin fishing is almost entirely limited to hook and harpoon — much of it based off Gloucester, as chronicled in the National Geographic channel reality show, “Wicked Tuna.”

Virtually everything about bluefin is hotly disputed including the status of the stocks. In May, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration rejected a petition by Center for Biological Diversity to consider bluefin an “endangered species” which would have ended recreational and commercial fishing for bluefin in U.S. waters, without affecting tuna fishing elsewhere. However, NOAA did put bluefin on its watchlist pending a stock assessment to be done later this year.

”ICCAT established these (two) management areas based on two known separate bluefin spawning locations (the Mediterranean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico), and the assumptions that bluefin always return to their native nursery grounds ... that fish on each side mature at vastly different ages (3-5 years in the Mediterranean vs. 8-12 years in the Gulf of Mexico), and that the two stocks have very low rates of mixing,” the Large Pelagics Research Center notes on its website.

”Over the decades, tagging studies with simple ID tags have shown that young, immature bluefin leave their native feeding ground and cross the Atlantic to mix with juveniles on the other side, such as between the Bay of Biscay and the waters off Cape Cod or the mid-Atlantic states.

”More recent studies show that in some years, the percentage of young fish crossing the Atlantic from the east may range above 50 percent. Scientists are now using biological markers from fish tissues, including DNA, chemical isotope signatures, and pesticide levels, to discern where in the Atlantic a fish has resided. Despite the significant gains in understanding from new scientific approaches, many questions remain about migration paths, food habits, spawning locations, age at maturity, and population size and structure of Atlantic bluefin tuna. LPRC scientists and collaborators are conducting research focused on these gaps in understanding.”

 

Read the full story in the Gloucester Times

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

GLOUCESTER DAILY TIMES: Where's the fisherman on review panel for new cod data?

August 18, 2014 -- It would be nice to think that, in the wake of an “unscheduled” stock assessment that conspicuously left out any input from fishermen or others inherently familiar with the industry, the planned “peer review” of the findings by NOAA’s NFSC would include someone who represents the fishermen’s interests before there is any move to carry out even more dire limit cuts for Gulf of Maine cod.