Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow Alerts arrow Brown Amendment to Require Annual Economic Assessments Independent of NOAA
Brown Amendment to Require Annual Economic Assessments Independent of NOAA
WASHINGTON - Feb. 1, 2011 - Yesterday, Senator Scott Brown (R-Massachusetts) introduced the Fishing Impact Statement Honesty (FISH) Act of 2011. 
 

Senator Brown's Fishery Impact Statement Honesty (FISH) Act would amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to require that economic impact statements on the affect of fishing regulations on communities be produced independently of NOAA and updated on an annual basis.
 
According to Senator Brown, fishing communities throughout Massachusetts are facing economic hardship because NOAA and the Commerce Department refuse to acknowledge that their catch share regulations are strangling the fishing industry.

The Commerce Department must be forced to produce an annual independent fisheries impact statement, so that officials at NOAA and the Commerce Department cannot ignore the situation or tailor the results of the statement to their own purposes.  Senator Brown's bill would require that the analysis be done by an outside neutral third party who would be chosen by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), not by NOAA or the Administration. 

If an independent auditor finds that NOAA regulations are hurting fishing communities, NOAA should be forced to make changes. Under the bill, the Secretary of Commerce is required to publish and implement a plan to address negative economic or social effects on fishing communities identified by the independent economic impact statement.

Read Senator Brown's proposed amendment to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

HASTINGS: Time to improve the Endangered Species Act

May 18, 2012 - When the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was signed into law in 1973 by President Nixon, he spoke about the importance of preserving “the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed.” I believe that goal is as important today as it was back then. However, after nearly 40 years, it’s time to take a fresh, honest look at the law and consider whether there are ways it could be improved to do a better job of protecting and recovering species.