Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow Alerts arrow Gloucester Times reports Massachusetts Senators' positions on Jones Amendment
Gloucester Times reports Massachusetts Senators' positions on Jones Amendment
GLOUCESTER, Mass. - The Gloucester Times has reported the positions of Massachusetts Senators John Kerry and Scott Brown on the Jones Amendment, which would block NOAA funding of new catch share programs.
 

Senator Kerry, the senior senator from Massachusetts and a Democrat, stated: "We all share the frustrations that led to the Jones Amendment," Kerry  in a statement e-mailed to the Times. "But if there's no viable path for it to become law right now, what's the best practical route forward to get the job done?"

Kerry's press secretary, Whitney Smith, told the Times she did not believe the statement meant he had decided against voting for the Jones amendment.

Both Republican and Democratic Capitol Hill sources in both the House and Senate have indicated that the Senate Majority Leadership (Democratic) and the House Majority Leadership (Republican) are leaning toward supporting a "clean" continuing resolution with no amendments.  However what will actually happen remains uncertain.

Kerry concluded that he would "keep working with our fishermen to fix the way catch shares are implemented in New England, and get the relief and results our guys deserve, end of story." He added, "I'll do that by any means that are necessary and viable."

Senator Brown, a Republican, told the Times via email that he would vote for the House-approved federal budget amendment to cut off funding for introducing new catch share programs. His press secretary, Colin Reed said: "Sen. Brown believes we should stop funding NOAA's current catch share policy, and (he) looks forward to working with his Senate colleagues to do just that."

Read the Gloucester Times story on Senator Kerry's position

Read the Gloucester Times story on Senator Brown's position




 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

HASTINGS: Time to improve the Endangered Species Act

May 18, 2012 - When the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was signed into law in 1973 by President Nixon, he spoke about the importance of preserving “the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed.” I believe that goal is as important today as it was back then. However, after nearly 40 years, it’s time to take a fresh, honest look at the law and consider whether there are ways it could be improved to do a better job of protecting and recovering species.