Commerce Secretary Gary Locke orders fishery enforcement penalties returned to 11 fishermen and businesses; accepts all of the Special Master's recommendations in his authority
May 17, 2011 - U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke announced today that $649,527 in
fisheries enforcement penalties will be returned to 11 individuals or
businesses after an independent review of their cases concluded the NOAA
enforcement program had in some instances “overstepped the bounds of
propriety and fairness.” In his decision memo
issued today, Secretary Locke acted on 30 cases reviewed by the Special
Master, Judge Charles Swartwood III, accepting all of his
recommendations that the law allows and taking additional actions in
several cases. Secretary Locke appointed Judge Swartwood to conduct the
independent review of cases identified by the Department of Commerce’s
Inspector General as problematic. The individuals and businesses will
receive their remittances within 30 days of receipt of payment
“As a former prosecutor, I expect our entire law enforcement program to uphold high standards and maintain the public’s trust. Enforcement has to be fair, uniform and consistent. I accepted all of the Special Master's recommendations in every instance where I have authority to do so under Magnuson-Stevens Act, and in some cases I went beyond the Special Master’s recommendation,” said Secretary Locke. “In addition, we are implementing additional reforms to make regulations and enforcement more fair and effective. We inherited this decades-old problem, but it’s ending on my watch.”
Among the businesses and fishermen who will receive returned penalties are the Gloucester Seafood Display Auction ($16,515) and former New Bedford sea scallop fisherman Lawrence Yacubian ($400,000), whose cases date back to the early 2000s. During the period of time associated with the 30 reviewed cases, NOAA investigated over 40,000 incidents and issued penalties or sanctions in about 6,000 cases. Judge Swartwood is currently reviewing approximately 80 additional applications that were received during a recent application period. The applications that meet the standards set forth in Secretary Locke’s March 2011 Decision Memorandum will receive further review.
“Today we acknowledge and rectify past mistakes, apologize to the fishermen and businesses hurt by these mistakes, and rededicate ourselves to work with the fishing industry to sustain and grow fishing jobs,” said Dr. Jane Lubchenco, under secretary of commerce for oceans and atmosphere and NOAA administrator, who traveled to Gloucester to meet with affected fishermen and with NOAA enforcement staff in the region. “Since coming into office two years ago, I made reform of our fisheries enforcement program a top priority. I believe today marks a major turning point in NOAA’s relationship with America’s fishermen, and in particular fishermen in New England.”
In June 2009, after hearing concerns from fishermen, businesses and elected officials, Dr. Lubchenco asked the Department of Commerce Inspector General to conduct a national review of NOAA’s enforcement program. Based on this review and other findings, Secretary Locke and Dr. Lubchenco instituted sweeping changes in its enforcement program, including:
-New enforcement leadership at headquarters and in the New England regional office;
-Transfer of authority to issue charges and settle cases from the field staff to supervisors in headquarters;
-A more transparent penalty policy to give greater clarity for the regulated community;
-A revision of regulations to place the burden on NOAA to justify its proposed penalty and permit sanctions in hearings before Administrative Law Judges;
-An Asset Forfeiture Fund Use Policy that greatly restricts the uses of the fund in order to ensure there is no conflict of interest, real or perceived, with the use of the fund; and
-Management and personnel changes that emphasize compliance over punishment, including the hiring of a former fishermen as compliance liaison in New England.
For a complete list of NOAA enforcement reforms instituted over the past two years, click here.
In response to Judge Swartwood’s report, Secretary Locke and Dr. Lubchenco announce that in addition to returning penalties, NOAA would take the following actions:
-Work with fishery management councils nationwide to simplify and streamline regulations;
-Work with all the regional fishery management councils to simplify fishery management regulations and provide routine training for the fishing industry and other stakeholders on regulatory compliance;
-Require all enforcement personnel and enforcement attorneys to attend annual professional and ethics training to ensure they follow fair, effective and professional procedures;
-Expand the compliance liaison program nationwide to assist fishermen at the waterfront better understand and have stronger incentives to comply with regulations;
-Reinforce current strict guidelines to limit communications between NOAA staff and administrative law judges to ensure there is no conflict of interest, real or perceived; and
-Finalize a workforce analysis to more appropriately balance the number of enforcement officers and special agents to more effectively communicate with the industry and match its enforcement needs.
“By reducing penalties, I want to make it clear that fisheries enforcement serves fisheries, fishermen, and fishing communities,” said Secretary Locke. “The primary goal of the enforcement program is to increase compliance with the regulations necessary to ensure our fisheries are sustainable. NOAA should strongly enforce marine resource laws, and act prudently to serve those whose livelihoods depend on the marine resources these laws protect. NOAA has worked to refocus its fisheries management, enforcement and compliance programs consistent with these goals. Today’s decision is one more step in that process.”
Read coverage in the Gloucester Times by Richard Gaines
Read the Commerce Dept./NOAA press release
Read the decision memo
See a list of the enforcement reforms.
See a timeline of enforcement actions.
September 29, 2014 -- Next week, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is hosting a three-day forum focused on the increasingly politicized topic of mercury contamination in fish. Why should you care? If you stop eating seafood, you’re actually putting yourself at risk.