Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Home arrow News arrow Economic Impact arrow FDA Seafood Import Refusals increase 50% in 2011
FDA Seafood Import Refusals increase 50% in 2011
Dick Gutting, in his Foreign Trade Alerts, reports today that for 2011, seafood import refusals by the FDA increased 50% over 2010. By his preliminary calculation, seafood refusals in 2011 totaled 2,776, up 50% from 2010.
 

A single import refusal may prompt FDA to list the exporter for future import detentions. Urner Barry maintains a database of all seafood rejections, so you can determine if your supplier has a violation using Foreign Trade Data.

Gutting says, “If you think that there were a lot of Import Refusals last year - you're right. The total for seafood in 2011 is 2,776, up 50 percent from 2010.

This three-year increase appears to be partly the result of an increase in FDA inspectors and inspections, rather than a decrease in industry compliance. FDA's budget proposals for FY 2012, for example, explain that FDA field inspections of food imports rose 23 percent to 170,392 in FY 2010 saying:

“With the increase in funding, FDA was able to bring on a significant number of new investigators. Field exams play a significant role in new investigator training . . . .”

Looking to the future FDA told Congress that it plans to better target its food import inspections in 2012 rather than increase their total number. However, whether the number of FDA inspections levels off this year, and what impact this will have on Import Refusals, remains to be seen.

Republished with permission from SeafoodNews.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share Print
 

STEVE SCHEIBLAUER: California's “Forage” Fish Protection Strongest in the World, Yet Extremists Still Want to Ban Fishing

Monterey Bay's historic "wetfish" industry is under attack by extremist groups who claim overfishing is occurring. Touting studies with faulty calculations, activists are lobbying federal regulators to massively limit fishing, if not ban these fisheries outright.  Apparently the facts don’t matter to groups with an anti-fishing agenda