Conservation Law Foundation Issues Remarks in Support of Amendment 16 in Advance of Hearing of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
|
|
Boston, MA - October 3, 2011 – Conservation Law Foundation issued the following statement and set of recommendations in connection with today’s U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation hearing on the first year of implementation of Amendment 16 to the Northeast Multispecies (Groundfish) Fishery Management Plan.
Amendment 16, which has been in effect since May 2010, was the result
of a three-year public process and was overwhelmingly approved by the
New England Fishery Management Council. While some predicted dire
revenue losses under the new sector system implemented by Amendment 16,
the National Marine Fisheries Service recently reported that all-species
gross revenues for the groundfish fleet in the 2010 fishing year–$297.7
million–were $26.6 million more than gross revenues in the 2009 fishing
year. Groundfish permit sales, an important indicator of consolidation
at an organization level, were extremely low.
“These outcomes show a healthy, adaptive fleet that has diversified
to target multiple species beyond groundfish, and that has begun to take
advantage of the added flexibility that the sector system in New
England provides even in the challenging start-up year,” said Peter
Shelley, CLF Senior Counsel. “Amendment 16 is an important step in the
right direction for New England and New England’s fishermen. It should
be supported in Washington, D.C., and efforts to improve the system
should be spearheaded in New England as intended by Congress.”
CLF also issued a set of recommendations for constructive steps
forward that will improve the outcomes of Amendment 16 and the sector
management system. These recommendations include:
The New England Fishery Management Council should place Amendment 18
high on its list of priority actions for the coming year. Amendment 18
has been specifically designed to look at a range of social and economic
and operational aspects of Amendment 16, including its consolidation
and distributional effects.
Congress should provide targeted research and development funding
for gear improvements and sector technology that will allow fishermen to
catch higher percentages of healthy fish populations without negatively
affecting rebuilding programs of overfished stocks.
Congress should provide increased funding for data collection
(fisheries-dependent and independent data) and analysis that could
increase the accuracy of stock assessments and give New England
fishermen the benefit of higher annual catch limits associated with
rebuilding stocks on a more timely basis.
Congress should continue to support and fund permit banks, revolving
loan funds, and other innovative social programs—including limits on
such programs—as those programs are being developed in the region at a
local or state level.
|
|
|
|